Cybersecurity News

CISA added FileZen CVE-2026-25108 to its KEV Catalog; Patch Now

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added CVE-2026-25108 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, that is being exploited in the wild.

Findings from CISA also confirmed about the flaw, that it affects Soliton Systems K.K. FileZen, a file transfer product. It has been included in KEV, sensing urgency for organizations still running vulnerable versions of the product.

“Soliton Systems K.K FileZen contains an OS command injection vulnerability when a user logs-in to the affected product and sends a specially crafted HTTP request,” CISA said.

Key Findings from FileZen CVE-2026-25108 vulnerability added in CISA’s KEV list

The primary reason after evaluation by threat researcher’s were –

FileZen CVE-2026-25108 is an OS command injection vulnerability. According to NVD, when the FileZen Antivirus Check Option is enabled, a logged-in user can send a specially crafted HTTP request and execute arbitrary operating system commands. In such scenario an attacker with valid access could potentially run commands on the underlying server, creating serious risk to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

  • The vulnerability carries a CVSS v4 score of 8.7 (High) from JPCERT/CC, and NVD also lists a CVSS v3.1 score of 8.8 (High).
  • Being a high-severity, actively exploited flaw tied to direct command execution and class of bug occurs when an application improperly handles input that ends up being interpreted by the operating system as a command.
  • For attackers it becomes easy to manipulate server behavior and potentially execute arbitrary commands

Why CISA added FileZen CVE-2026-25108 to its KEV

  • The vulnerability is not unauthenticated and any exploitation by attackers will requires a user to be logged in and it’s still not safe.
  • What we witnessed in case of many real-world attacks always begins with stolen credentials or weak passwords or previously compromised accounts of less privileged.
  • Any availability of any valid account could escalate the flaw like FileZen CVE-2026-25108 can pave way for an deeper compromise in future.
  • This is exactly why CISA’s KEV addition matters so much. A KEV listing means the issue has moved beyond theoretical risk and into confirmed real-world exploitation.
Impact of the Vulnerability as assessed by vendor JVN (Japan Vulnerability Notes)

JVN states that if a user logs in to the affected product and sends a specially crafted HTTP request, an arbitrary OS command may be executed.

Soliton similarly says there is a possibility that a remote third party could execute arbitrary OS commands within FileZen.

The practical impact of that can be severe. Depending on server configuration and user privileges, successful exploitation could allow an attacker to:

  • Run unauthorized commands on the server
  • Manipulate files or processes
  • Establish persistence
  • Access sensitive transferred data
  • Use the compromised FileZen environment as a pivot point into internal systems

Technical Analysis of CVE-2026-25108

OS command injection occurs when an application transmits unsafe data-such as cookies, form fields, or HTTP headers-to an operating system shell. In the case of FileZen, the vulnerability manifests during the file processing phase when the Antivirus Check Option is active. The system’s internal logic processes HTTP requests in a manner that allows an attacker to append shell commands to legitimate parameters.

Remediation & understanding why it is essential to integrate with threat intelligence monitoring platform

Organizations utilizing these versions must prioritize the transition to version 5.0.11 or later. When vendor platform Soliton indicated that simply disabling the Antivirus Check Option may reduce the immediate attack surface but does not replace the requirement for a full firmware update.

As per vendor’s suggestion a resetting of password for all users if an organization suspects a compromise. Integration with cyber threat intelligence platform will provide early warning indicators of exploitation as cyber threat intelligence platforms collect data from various sources to provide early warning indicators of exploitation.

CISA has set a deadline of March 17, 2026, for Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to remediate CVE-2026-25108. This mandate specifically applies to federal agencies, it serves as a stark reminder for private sector organizations. The inclusion in the KEV catalog implies that the vulnerability is being used in the wild, likely by state-sponsored actors or organized cybercriminal groups.




Sources; CVE-2026-25108 CISA Confirms Active Exploitation of FileZen

Microsoft 365 Copilot Defect Exposes AI Summarizes of Confidential Emails

Microsoft 365 Copilot Vulnerability Bypasses DLP Policies, Summarizes Confidential Emails; Bug Tracked CW1226324

Summary :

A recently disclosed issue in Microsoft 365 Copilot caused the AI assistant to summarize confidential emails despite sensitivity labels and Data Loss Prevention (DLP) policies being configured. 

The bug, tracked under CW1226324, allowed Copilot’s “Work Tab” chat feature to process and summarize emails from Sent Items and Draft folders, even when those emails carried confidentiality labels designed to restrict automated access. 

Microsoft findings

Microsoft’s investigation revealed a code-level defect as the root cause. The flaw allows Copilot to inadvertently pick up items stored in users’ Sent Items and Draft folders, bypassing the confidentiality labels applied to those messages.

Although Microsoft categorized the issue as an advisory with potentially limited scope, the incident raises significant concerns regarding AI governance, trust boundaries, and enterprise data protection controls.

As per CSN the flaw allows Copilot to inadvertently pick up items stored in users’ Sent Items and Draft folders, ignoring the confidentiality labels applied to those messages.

Vulnerability Details 

The issue happened because of an internal coding mistake in Microsoft 365 Copilot’s Work Tab chat feature. Due to this error, Copilot was able to access emails stored in Sent and Draft folders, even if they were marked as confidential. 

In normal conditions, sensitivity labels and DLP policies should block automated tools from processing such emails.

However, because of this flaw, Copilot treated those protected emails as regular content and created summaries from them until Microsoft began deploying a fix in February 2026. 

Attack Flow 

Step Description 
Configuration Organization applies confidentiality labels and DLP policies to sensitive emails. 
Storage Emails are stored in Sent Items or Draft folders. 
Trigger User interacts with Copilot “Work Tab” Chat. 
Processing Due to the code bug, Copilot accesses labeled emails. 
Exposure Copilot generates summaries of confidential content, bypassing expected DLP enforcement. 

Source:0din 

Why It’s Effective 

  • DLP Control Bypass: AI processing occurred despite policy enforcement. 
  • Trust Boundary Violation: Copilot acted as a privileged internal processor without honoring classification restrictions. 
  • Compliance Risk: Potential regulatory implications under GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001, and industry frameworks. 
  • AI Governance Gap: Demonstrates that AI systems must be independently validated against traditional security controls. 

Broader Implications 

This issue shows that AI tools inside business software can sometimes ignore security rules, even when protection like DLP and sensitivity labels are properly set. It proves that AI systems can create new risk areas that traditional security controls may not fully cover. 

As more companies use AI assistants in daily work, security teams must regularly test and monitor how AI handles sensitive data. AI should be treated like a powerful internal system that needs strict oversight, not just a simple productivity feature. 

Remediation

Microsoft has initiated a fixed rollout and is monitoring deployment progress. However, organizations should take proactive measures: 

  • Validate that sensitivity labels are now properly enforced with Copilot. 
  • Audit Copilot usage logs and AI interaction history. 
  • Re-test DLP enforcement across Sent and Draft folders. 
  • Update AI governance documentation and risk registers. 
  • Conduct tabletop exercises covering AI-driven data exposure scenarios. 

Conclusion: 
This incident highlights that AI integrations can introduce unexpected security gaps, even in well-configured enterprise environments. Organizations cannot assume that existing security controls will automatically work the same way with AI-powered features. 

As AI adoption increases, companies must strengthen AI governance, continuously validate security policies, and monitor AI behavior just like any other critical system. Proactive testing and oversight are essential to prevent future data exposure risks. 

Bypassing DLP policies by AI aided assistants signals huge security gap which needs to be addressed at enterprise level as AI tool taking over enterprise security posture cannot be undermined.

References

Critical Flaw Identified in Fortinet Product ‘FortiClientEMS’; Security Updates Released

Fortinet released security updates for CVE-2026-2164

Fortinet has recently addressed a critical security vulnerability, identified as CVE-2026-21643, in its FortiClientEMS product. This flaw is classified as a SQL injection vulnerability, enables unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or system commands on affected systems by sending specially crafted HTTP requests.

Fortinet has released security updates to address a critical flaw impacting FortiClientEMS that could lead to the execution of arbitrary code on susceptible systems.

Technical Details

With a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1, this vulnerability is considered critical and poses a significant risk to organizations relying on FortiClientEMS for endpoint management.

The flaws affect the following versions –

  • FortiClientEMS 7.2 (Not affected)
  • FortiClientEMS 7.4.4 (Upgrade to 7.4.5 or above)
  • FortiClientEMS 8.0 (Not affected)

The vulnerability, CVE-2026-21643, resides in the FortiClientEMS administrative web interface.

Reason for the flaw or vulnerability to appear is caused by improper neutralization of user-supplied input in SQL queries. The flaw allows an unauthenticated attacker to send specially crafted HTTP requests to the FortiClientEMS GUI.

This resulted in the execution of arbitrary SQL statements, leading to unauthorized access, data exfiltration, privilege escalation and remote code execution (RCE) on any primary system.

Remediation

Immediate patching is strongly recommended to prevent potential exploitation, as the vulnerability allows attackers to bypass authentication and gain full control over the targeted system.

  • In addition to patching, organizations should implement the following best practices to reduce exposure and detect potential exploitation attempts.
  • Administrators should review web server and application logs for unusual or unauthorized HTTP requests targeting the FortiClientEMS administrative interface.
  • Monitoring for unexpected creation of administrative accounts or the execution of system commands originating from the FortiClientEMS host can help identify compromise.
  • Restricting network access to the FortiClientEMS management interface to trusted IP addresses and enforcing strong authentication controls can further reduce the attack surface.

There is currently no evidence of exploitation in the wild but the flaw has been termed a high-priority issue for all organizations using the affected product version, reason the attack surface is vulnerable.

Fortinet has since acknowledged that the issue has been actively exploited by bad actors to create local admin accounts for persistence, make configuration changes granting VPN access to those accounts, and exfiltrate the firewall configurations.

Conclusion:

The vulnerability is not present in FortiClientEMS versions 7.2, 8.0, or FortiEMS Cloud. The issue has been resolved in FortiClientEMS version 7.4.5 and later.

In the past similar Fortinet SQL injection and remote code execution vulnerabilities were found in Fortinet products and was targeted by cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors for financial benefits.

Sources: FortiClientEMS CVE-2026-21643: Critical Unauthenticated SQL Injection Vulnerability Allows Remote Code Execution

DNS CNAME Used as Relay Attack for New Kerberos-PoC Released

A dangerous flaw in how Windows environments handle Kerberos service ticket requests one that significantly expands the practical attack surface for Kerberos relaying in Active Directory. 

Continue Reading
Scroll to top