Cyber security

OpenCTI Web-Hook Flaw Enables Full System Compromise

Summary

OEMFiligran
SeverityCritical
CVSS Score9.1
CVEsCVE-2025-24977
Actively ExploitedNo
Exploited in WildNo
Advisory Version1.0

Overview

A critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-24977) in the OpenCTI Platform allows authenticated users with specific permissions to execute arbitrary commands on the host infrastructure, leading to potential full system compromise.

Vulnerability NameCVE IDProduct AffectedSeverityFixed Version
​ Webhook Remote Code Execution vulnerability  CVE-2025-24977OpenCTI  Critical  6.4.11

Technical Summary

The vulnerability resides in OpenCTI’s webhook templating system, which is built on JavaScript. Users with elevated privileges can inject malicious JavaScript into web-hook templates.

Although the platform implements a basic sandbox to prevent the use of external modules, this protection can be bypassed, allowing attackers to gain command execution within the host container.

Due to common deployment practices using Docker or Kubernetes, where environment variables are used to pass sensitive data (eg: credentials, tokens), exploitation of this flaw may expose critical secrets and permit root-level access, leading to full infrastructure takeover.

CVE IDSystem AffectedVulnerability DetailsImpact
    CVE-2025-24977  OpenCTI (≤ v6.4.10)The webhook feature allows JavaScript-based message customization. Users with manage customizations permission can craft malicious JavaScript in templates to bypass restrictions and execute OS-level commands. Since OpenCTI is often containerized, attackers can gain root access and extract sensitive environment variables passed to the container.  Root shell access in the container, exposure of sensitive secrets, full system compromise, lateral movement within infrastructure.

Remediation:

  • Upgrade: Immediately update to OpenCTI version 6.4.11 or later.
  • Restrict user permissions: Especially the manage customizations capability — limit access to trusted personnel only.
  • Review and audit: Existing webhook configurations for signs of misuse, unauthorized scripts, or suspicious behavior.
  • Implement container hardening practices: Reduce risk of secret exposure by:
    • Avoiding storage of secrets in environment variables when possible.
    • Using dedicated secret management tools.
    • Running containers with least privilege and limiting runtime capabilities.

The misuse can grant the attacker a root shell inside a container, exposing internal server-side secrets and potentially compromising the entire infrastructure.

Conclusion:
CVE-2025-24977 presents a highly exploitable attack vector within the OpenCTI platform and must be treated as an urgent priority for remediation.

The combination of remote code execution, privileged access and secret exposure in containerized environments makes it especially dangerous.

Organizations leveraging OpenCTI should upgrade to the latest version without delay, review their deployment security posture, and enforce strict access control around webhook customization capabilities.

References:

Apache Parquet Java Vulnerability Enables Remote Code Execution via Avro Schema 

Summary Security Advisory:

A high-severity remote code execution (RCE) has been identified in Apache Parquet Java, specifically within the parquet-avro module. Discovered by Apache contributor Gang Wu, this vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 1.15.1 and can allow attackers to execute arbitrary code when a system processes a specially crafted Parquet file. The issue is fixed in version 1.15.2. 

OEM Apache 
Severity High 
CVSS Score Not Available 
CVEs CVE-2025-46762 
Actively Exploited No 
Exploited in Wild No 
Advisory Version 1.0 

Overview 

Apache Parquet is an open-source, columnar storage format designed for efficient data processing, widely used by big data platforms and organizations engaged in data engineering and analytics.

Vulnerability Name CVE ID Product Affected Severity Fixed Version 
Remote Code Execution vulnerability  CVE-2025-46762 Apache Parquet Java  High  1.15.2 

Technical Summary 

CVE-2025-46762 arises from insecure schema parsing logic in the parquet-avro module of Apache Parquet Java. When the application uses the “specific” or “reflect” Avro data models to read a Parquet file, malicious actors can inject specially crafted metadata into the Avro schema portion of the file.

Upon deserialization, the system may inadvertently execute code from Java classes listed in the default trusted packages (e.g., java.util), resulting in remote code execution. The vulnerability is not present when using the safer “generic” Avro model. 

CVE ID System Affected Vulnerability Details Impact 
  CVE-2025-46762  Apache Parquet Java ≤1.15.1 Insecure deserialization in the parquet-avro module allows execution of arbitrary Java classes when processing Parquet files with embedded malicious Avro schemas. The issue is exploitable only when using the “specific” or “reflect” data models, and relies on the presence of pre-approved trusted packages like java.util.  Remote Code Execution (RCE), potential supply chain compromise, unauthorized code execution. 

Conditions for Exploitation: 

  • Applications must use parquet-avro to read Parquet files. 
  • The Avro “specific” or “reflect” deserialization models are used (not “generic”). 
  • Attacker-supplied or untrusted Parquet files are processed by the system. 

This creates significant risk in data processing environments such as Apache Spark, Flink, and Hadoop, where external Parquet files are commonly ingested. 

Remediation

  • Upgrade to Apache Parquet Java version 1.15.2: This version addresses the vulnerability by tightening controls around trusted packages and blocking unsafe deserialization. 
  • For users unable to upgrade immediately: apply the following JVM system property to disable trusted package deserialization: 

-Dorg.apache.parquet.avro.SERIALIZABLE_PACKAGES=”” 

Conclusion: 
CVE-2025-46762 presents a significant RCE threat within big data ecosystems that use Apache Parquet Java with the parquet-avro module. Systems relying on unsafe deserialization patterns are especially at risk. Prompt patching or configuration hardening is strongly recommended to safeguard against exploitation. 

References

Frequency & Sophistication of DDoS Attack rise to198% in 1stQ 2025

Ways to protect enterprise assets and infrastructure is not only a CISO’s responsibility but a cause of worry for CXO, CTO ‘s as a powerful DDoS attack can cause havoc on revenues, productivity and reputation.

Threat mitigation from any DDoS attack, requires services from secured and trusted partners who can offer expertise and scale whenever required to mitigate the threats that emerge from DDoS attack.

This is also important from cost point of view as large enterprise bear the burnout and it requires expertise to constantly monitor and clean the traffic that get routed to customer network.

It is important organization find service oriented partners who have skilled networking capacity and processing power so that in face of attack, they can automatically respond to DDoS attacks, detect and mitigate.

According to MazeBolt research, even the best DDoS protections leave enterprises highly exposed. Typically, large-scale, global organizations are only 60% protected – leaving the door wide open for cybercriminals to exploit the gaps.

Statistics show from past DDoS attacks have taken down large services like Spotify, GitHub, Microsoft services like Outlook and OneDrive.

According to new data released by Netscout, distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks are on the rise. There were 17 million such attacks in 2024 – up from 13 million the year before. It’s an astonishing rise that has big implications for your business.

Defining DDoS attack

When a cyber criminal or malicious actor push for a service with additional requests than it can handle, making the resources unavailable and non-functional subsequently bringing it down.

In cases DDoS attack forcefully shuts a website, network, or computer offline by overloading it with requests. We often hear Black Friday sales out in big giant displays, these often drive a lot of internet traffic towards the brand or one destination at once.

A DDoS attack works when several different IP addresses target the same platform at same time that can overwhelm the server in question and bring it down.

Often, this attack is carried botnets which are a collection of devices when infected with malware, they can controlled remotely by cyber criminals. DDoS attack is executed by several different actors at the same time.

Increase in DDoS Attack in 2025

DDoS attacks increased by 198% compared to the last quarter of 2024 and by 358% compared to the same quarter last year.

On April 3 attack targeted an unnamed online betting organization, lasting around 90 minutes, starting at 11:15 with a surge of 67Gbps, before escalating sharply to 217Gbps by 11:23, and peaked just short of 1Tbps at 965Gbps by 11:36.

Research shows A total of 20.5 million DDoS attacks were stopped during the period, of which 6.6 million attacks were directly targeted at Cloudflare’s infrastructure. Gaming servers were the most popular target for DDoS attacks. Attack patterns remains spotted during the 2024 UEFA European Football Championship, held in Germany, where spikes in DDoS activity also targeted online betting sites.

In Geopolitics DDoS has emerged as a tool that is often and can be abused to target attacks.

According to research by NETSCOUT, the second half of 2024 saw almost 9 million DDoS attacks, a 12.75% increase from the first six months. Israel in particular saw a 2,844% increase in attacks, seeing a high of 519 in one day.

The above mentioned Russian hacking group, NoName057(16), focused primarily on government services in the UK, Belgium, and Spain. Georgia also saw a 1,489% increase in attacks in the lead up to the “Russia Bill”, highlighting its use as a political weapon.

Network-layer DDoS attacks were the primary driver of the overall surge. In Q1 2025, 16.8 million of these attacks were blocked, representing a 509% year-over-year rise and a 397% increase from the prior quarter.

Hyper-volumetric attacks, defined as those exceeding 1 terabit per second (Tbps) or one billion packets per second (Bpps), have become increasingly common. Cloudflare reported approximately 700 such attacks during the quarter, averaging about eight per day.

Major targets of DDoS attack

Globally, there have been notable changes in the most-targeted locations. Germany moved up four spots to become the most attacked country in Q1 2025.

Turkey made an 11-place jump to secure second position, while China dropped to third. Hong Kong, India, and Brazil also appeared among the top most-attacked countries, with movements seen across several regions in the rankings. Australia, for its part, remained outside the global top ten.

Industries facing the most pressure have shifted this quarter as well. The Gambling & Casinos sector moved to the top position as the most targeted industry, after climbing four places.

Telecommunications dropped to second, and Information Technology & Services followed in third.

Other industries experiencing notable increases in attacks included Cyber Security, which jumped 37 places, and Airlines, Aviation & Aerospace. In Australia, the industries facing the most attacks were Telecommunications, Information Technology and Services, Human Resources, and Consumer Services.

The report detailed attack vectors and trends, showing that the most common technique at the network layer remains SYN flood attacks, followed by DNS flood and Mirai-launched attacks.

Among HTTP DDoS attacks, more than 60% were identified and blocked as known botnets, with others attributed to suspicious attributes, browser impersonation, and cache busting techniques.

Cloudflare observed significant surges in two emerging attack methods. CLDAP reflection/amplification attacks grew by 3,488% quarter-over-quarter, exploiting the connectionless nature of the protocol to overwhelm victims with reflected traffic.

Similarly, ESP reflection/amplification attacks rose 2,301%, underscoring vulnerabilities in systems using the Encapsulating Security Payload protocol.

Despite the increase in the volume and size of attacks, the report noted that 99% of network-layer DDoS attacks in Q1 2025 were below 1 Gbps and one million packets per second.

Likewise, 94% of HTTP attacks fell below one million requests per second. Most attacks were short-lived, with 89% of network-layer and 75% of HTTP attacks ending within 10 minutes, but the impact can persist much longer due to the resulting service disruptions.

Addressing the rise of DDoS attack & Mitigation solution

DDoS attack intends to disrupt some or all of its target’s services there are variety of DDoS attacks. They are all uniquely different. There are three common types of DDoS attacks:

  • Volumetric (Gbps)
  • Protocol (pps)
  • Application layer (rps) attacks.

An effective DDoS attack is launched when near by network detects easily the cheap IoT devices like toys, small appliances, thermostats, security camera and Wi-Fi routers. These devices makes it easy to launch an effective attack that can have massive impact.

Threat Mitigation of DDoS attack

Application Layer attacks can be detected early with solutions by monitoring visitor behavior, blocking known bad bots and constant testing.

To do this more effectively Intrucept recently launched Cyber Analytics platform

Cyber Analytics platform 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗺𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗹𝘆 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝗴𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝗰𝘆𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗲𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗶.𝗲. 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁-𝗶𝗻-𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘀.

✅ XDR (Extended Detection & Response)
✅ Next-Gen SIEM (Security Information & Event Management)
✅ SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation & Response)
✅ Threat Intelligence
✅ AI-Powered Security Analytics
𝗖𝘆𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀:
Real-time threat detection across endpoints, cloud, networks, and apps
Automated incident response to reduce MTTR & human fatigue
AI-driven insights to power proactive, risk-based decision-making
Built for agility, scalability & actionable intelligence; our platform gives security teams the edge required to move from playing catch-up to staying ahead.
𝗖𝘆𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀.

Sources; Targeted by 20.5 million DDoS attacks, up 358% year-over-year: Cloudflare’s 2025 Q1 DDoS Threat Report

DDoS attacks have skyrocketed 358% year-over-year, report says

April Zero-Day Threats Addressed in Microsoft’s Patch Tuesday

Summary of Microsoft April Patch Tuesday

Microsoft released April 2025 Patch Tuesday, addressed 135 security vulnerabilities, including a critical zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-29824) already being actively exploited.

  • 126 Microsoft CVEs addressed
  • 9 non-Microsoft CVEs included

Microsoft April Patch Tuesday is released every month on priority basis so that organization can address the vulnerabilities as advised by security analysts

OEMMicrosoft
SeverityCritical
Date of Announcement2025-04-08
No. of Vulnerabilities Patched135
Actively ExploitedYes
Exploited in WildYes
Advisory Version1.0

Overview

Key updates focus on core Windows components like the CLFS driver, Windows Kernel, and multiple remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities across many services including Remote Desktop Gateway, LDap, and TCP/IP.

The update addresses both Microsoft and non-Microsoft vulnerabilities, with a significant emphasis on fixing issues that allow attackers to elevate privileges, execute remote code, or bypass security features.

On a similar note publication of 11 critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities. 13 browser vulnerabilities have already been published separately this month, and are not included in the total.

Vulnerability NameCVE IDProduct AffectedSeverityCVSS Score
Microsoft Windows CLFS Driver Use-After-Free Vulnerability [zero-day vulnerability]  CVE-2025-29824WindowsHigh7.8
Remote Desktop Gateway Service RCE VulnerabilityCVE-2025-27480 CVE-2025-27482WindowsHigh8.1
LDAP Service RCE VulnerabilityCVE-2025-26663WindowsHigh   8.1
LDAP Client RCE VulnerabilityCVE-2025-26670WindowsHigh8.1

Technical Summary

The April 2025 update fixes several high-severity vulnerabilities in Microsoft products, here are some vulnerabilities details:

CVE IDSystem AffectedVulnerability DetailsImpact
    CVE-2025-29824  Windows 10/11, Windows ServerAn elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Windows Kernel caused by improper object access. Attackers with local access could exploit this to gain SYSTEM privileges.    Elevation of Privilege
  CVE-2025-27480 CVE-2025-27482  Windows RDSRace condition in Remote Desktop Gateway; triggers use-after-free allowing code execution  Remote Code Execution
  CVE-2025-26663  Windows LDAPCrafted LDAP call causes use-after-free, leading to arbitrary code execution  Remote Code Execution
CVE-2025-26670  Windows TCP/IPMemory mismanagement during DHCPv6 handling, complex exploit chain.  Remote Code Execution

Source: Microsoft & NVD

In addition to the actively exploited vulnerabilities, several other Vulnerabilities were also addressed:

  • CVE-2025-27745, CVE-2025-27748, CVE-2025-27749 – Office Use-After-Free RCE Vulnerability

These vulnerabilities allow attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely by exploiting use-after-free conditions when opening malicious Office files, potentially leading to system compromise.

  • CVE-2025-27752 – Excel Heap Overflow RCE Vulnerability

An attacker could bypass security features via improper neutralization in the Microsoft Management Console, leading to remote code execution and potential full system compromise.

  • CVE-2025-29791 – Excel Type Confusion RCE Vulnerability

This vulnerability allows local attackers to exploit improper logging in NTFS, potentially granting unauthorized access to sensitive memory areas, which could lead to arbitrary code execution.

  • CVE-2025-26686 – Windows TCP/IP RCE Vulnerability

Memory mismanagement during DHCPv6 handling could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, requiring a complex exploit chain to be effective.

  • CVE-2025-27491 – Windows Hyper-V RCE Vulnerability

This vulnerability can be exploited by guest users through social engineering, enabling remote code execution on the host system, with a high complexity for successful exploitation.

Remediation:

  • Apply Patches Promptly: Install the April 2025 security updates immediately to mitigate risks.

General Recommendations:

  • Prioritize Zero-Day & Critical Vulnerabilities: Focus on patching actively exploited vulnerabilities, especially those affecting Windows CLFS, RDS, LDAP, Excel, and SharePoint-related CVEs.
  • Secure File System Access: Implement security controls to prevent unauthorized access to NTFS and FAT file systems, particularly against USB-based attack vectors.
  • Educate Employees: Train users in phishing risks to reduce the chances of executing malicious Microsoft Access files.
  • Monitor for Exploitation: Continuously monitor systems for any signs of exploitation or suspicious activity.

“Microsoft highly recommends that organizations prioritize applying security updates for elevation of privilege vulnerabilities to add a layer of defense against ransomware attacks if threat actors are able to gain an initial foothold,” the company said in a blog post.

Conclusion:

The April 2025 Patch Tuesday release underscores the critical need for timely patching of Microsoft systems to protect against actively exploited vulnerabilities, including a zero-day privilege escalation flaw.

Microsoft has addressed multiple high-severity vulnerabilities, many of which could result in remote code execution, unauthorized system access, or privilege escalation.

IT teams and users are urged to promptly install the security updates and implement recommended security controls to mitigate these risks. As these vulnerabilities are actively exploited, immediate action is crucial to safeguarding systems from potential compromise.

References:

WordPress Ultimate CSV Importer Flaws Put 20,000+ Sites at Risk

Threat researchers discovered an arbitrary File Upload vulnerability and an Arbitrary File Deletion vulnerability within the WP Ultimate CSV Importer plugin. This is affecting versions 7.19 and earlier.

The vulnerabilities have been addressed in version 7.19.1 of the plugin.

Summary 

OEM WordPress 
Severity High 
CVSS Score 8.8 
CVEs CVE-2025-2008, CVE- 2025-2007 
Actively Exploited Yes 
Exploited in Wild Yes 
Advisory Version 1.0 

Overview 

The security flaw WordPress plugin, Ultimate CSV Importer, affecting over 20,000 websites. The vulnerabilities, identified as CVE-2025-2008 and CVE-2025-2007, can lead to catastrophic consequences, including complete site compromise. 

Vulnerability Name CVE ID Product Affected Severity CVSS Score 
Arbitrary File Upload  CVE-2025-2008 WordPress  High  8.8 
Arbitrary File Deletion  CVE-2025-2007 WordPress  High  8.1 

Technical Summary 

A critical security vulnerability has been discovered in the WP Ultimate CSV Importer plugin (versions ≤ v7.19). This flaw allows attackers with only Subscriber level access to exploit the system in two dangerous ways: 

  1. Malicious File Upload: Attackers can upload malicious files, potentially enabling remote code execution and granting full control over the affected site. This allows for complete site compromise, including the ability to install backdoors or steal sensitive information. 
  1. Critical File Deletion: Attackers can delete crucial files, such as wp-config.php, which can reset the WordPress site and give attackers the ability to take full control over the site. 
CVE ID System Affected Vulnerability Details Impact 
  CVE-2025-2008  WP Ultimate CSV Importer plugin (versions ≤ 7.19) A critical flaw in the WP Ultimate CSV Importer plugin (≤ v7.19) allows attackers with Subscriber access to upload malicious files due to improper file type validation.
This can lead to remote code execution (RCE) and full site takeover. 
  Remote code execution (RCE) 
 CVE-2025-2007 WP Ultimate CSV Importer plugin (versions ≤ 7.19) A serious flaw in the WP Ultimate CSV Importer plugin (≤ v7.19) allows attackers with Subscriber access to delete critical files, like wp-config.php, due to weak file path validation.
This can reset the site, letting attackers take control. 
 Arbitrary file deletion leading to site reset 

Remediation

Install version 7.19.1 or later to fix the security flaws. Keeping all plugins and WordPress updated helps prevent attacks. 

General Recommendations 

  • Update the Plugin – Install the latest version (7.19.1+) to fix security issues and keep your site safe. 
  • Limit User Access – Allow only trusted users to upload or delete files to prevent hackers from exploiting vulnerabilities. 
  • Use Security Plugins – Install tools to block threats, monitor activity, and protect your site. 
  • Backup Your Website – Regularly save backups so you can restore your site if it gets hacked or files are deleted. 

Conclusion: 

A major security issue in a popular WordPress plugin put over 20,000 websites at risk of being taken over by hackers.

Attackers could upload harmful files or delete important ones, making websites vulnerable. This incident shows why keeping plugins updated, limiting user access, and using security tools is crucial. Updating to version 7.19.1 is necessary to stay protected. 

References

Coinbase Identified as Primary Target in GitHub Action supply chain attack

Recently the attack on Coinbase by bad actors and targeting their agentkit project revealed that attackers are active in crypto community. The attackers gained right to access to the repository after obtaining a GitHub token with sufficient permissions.

As per researchers from at Palo Alto Networks’ Unit 42 and Wiz, attackers compromised continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines of thousands of repositories, putting them at risk.

The attack failed and highlighted the constant threats against crypto projects happening and in this case the aim was on the Coinbase project, get access to exchange ecosystem and steal crypto assets. On time Coinbase took handle of the incident that could have led attacker to change approach to a large-scale attack and compromise many projects.

As per Reuters, 2025 the crypto industry has suffered a series of thefts, prompting questions about the security of customer funds, with hacking amount more than $2 billion in 2024 – the fourth straight year where proceeds have topped more than $1 billion.

Details of the attack methodology

According to cybersecurity firm Wiz, its analysis of GitHub identities used in the attack shows that the attacker is active in the crypto community and likely operates from Europe or Africa.

The attack exploited vulnerabilities in popular GitHub Actions, leading to the potential exposure of sensitive CI/CD secrets across numerous projects.

The attack involved the compromise of the review dog/action-setup@v1 GitHub Action.

A total of 218 repositories were confirmed to have exposed secrets, despite over 23,000 using the affected action. The payload was focused on exploiting the public CI/CD flow of one of their open source projects – agentkit, probably with the purpose of leveraging it for further compromises. However, the attacker was not able to use Coinbase secrets or publish packages.

  • After this initial attack, threat actor believed to have moved to the larger attack scenario that has since gained widespread attention globally.
  • As per researchers the attacker began preparing several days before reports surfaced, eventually affecting specific versions of tj-actions/changed-files and putting a significant number of repositories at risk.
  • The incident reflects how attackers can abuse third-party actions or dependencies to compromise software supply chains, potentially resulting in unauthorized access, data breaches and code tampering.
  • Attackers actions confirmed what was initially highly focused on Coinbase and expanded to all projects utilizing tj-actions/changed-files once their initial attempt failed.

The exposed secrets included GitHub tokens and other sensitive information, with some being short-lived.

“The attacker took significant measures to conceal their tracks using various techniques, such as leveraging dangling commits, creating multiple temporary GitHub user accounts, and obfuscating their activities in workflow logs (especially in the initial Coinbase attack),” Gil, Senior Research Manager at Palo Alto Networks, told The Hacker News. “These findings indicate that the attacker is highly skilled and has a deep understanding of CI/CD security threats and attack tactics.”

Overview of attack:

The attack affected only 218 were confirmed to have leaked secrets. The majority of these secrets were short-lived tokens that expire after a single workflow run. However, some repositories also exposed more sensitive credentials, including those for DockerHub, npm, and AWS.

tj-actions and reviewdog

During March 10 and March 14, 2025, an attacker successfully pushed a malicious commit to the tj-actions/changed-files GitHub repository. This commit contained a Base64-encoded payload shown in Figure 1, which prints all of the credentials that were present in the CI runner’s memory to the workflow’s log.

(Image: unit42.paloaltonetworks)

Figure 1. The malicious snippet that was introduced to tj-actions/changed-files.

The company stated that their security measures prevented any successful exploitation of the exposed secrets.

While Coinbase managed to avert significant damage, the incident serves as a reminder for organizations to strengthen their security protocols and remain vigilant against potential threats in the software supply chain.

The attacker was able to add the malicious commit (0e58ed8) to the repository by using a GitHub token with write permissions that they obtained previously. The attacker disguised the commit to look as if it was created by renovate[bot] — a legitimate user.

The commit was then added to a legitimate pull request that was opened by the real renovate[bot] and automatically merged, as configured for this workflow.

These steps enabled the attacker to infect the repository, without the activity being detected. Once the commit was merged, the attacker pushed new git tags to the repository to override its existing tags, making them all point to the malicious commit in the repository.

Coinbase as a soft target for attackers

Cryptocurrency platforms are frequent targets for cybercriminals due to their high-value assets and financial data.

Coinbase’s agentkit repository is used for blockchain AI agents, meaning any compromise could potentially be used for manipulating transactions, altering AI behavior, or gaining unauthorized access to blockchain-related systems. Researchers have witnessed a systemic risks of software supply chains, particularly in open-source ecosystems.

When a single dependency is compromised, it can have far-reaching consequences across thousands of projects. The reliance on shared libraries and GitHub Actions makes modern development more efficient but also inherently vulnerable to such cascading attacks.

The GitHub Actions supply chain attack highlights the vulnerabilities inherent in widely used automation tools.


Sources:

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/coinbase-was-primary-target-of-recent-github-actions-breaches/

https://undercodenews.com

 


Click here

High-Severity DoS Vulnerability in Cisco NX-OS Software

MPLS Encapsulated IPv6 Denial of Service Vulnerability

OEM CISCO 
Severity High 
CVSS score 7.4 
CVEs CVE-2025-20111 
Exploited in Wild No 
Patch/Remediation Available Yes 
Advisory Version 1.0 

Overview 

A high-severity vulnerability (CVE-2025-20111) in Cisco Nexus 3000 and 9000 Series Switches operating in standalone NX-OS mode could allow unauthenticated attackers to trigger a denial-of-service (DoS) condition by sending crafted ethernet frames, leading to unexpected device reloads. 

Vulnerability Name CVE ID Product Affected Severity 
 Denial of service vulnerability  CVE-2025-20111   Cisco Nexus   High 

Technical Summary 

The vulnerability originates from improper handling of specific Ethernet frames within the health monitoring diagnostics of Cisco Nexus switches.

An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker can exploit this flaw by sending a sustained rate of crafted Ethernet frames to a vulnerable device. Successful exploitation results in repeated device reloads, disrupting network operations and potentially impacting high-availability environments. 

CVE ID System Affected Vulnerability Details Impact 
 CVE-2025-20111  Nexus 3000 Series: 3100, 3200, 3400, and 3600 models Nexus 9000 Series: 9200, 9300, and 9400 switches running standalone NX-OS Improper handling of specific Ethernet frames in health monitoring diagnostics  Repeated device reboots, potential network downtime  

Remediation

  • Apply Software Updates: Cisco has released patched software versions to address the vulnerability. Network administrators should upgrade affected devices immediately. 
  • Use Cisco Software Checker: Organizations should verify their exposure using Cisco’s Software Checker tool to identify the earliest fixed release. 
  • Implement Workarounds: If immediate patching is not feasible, organizations can mitigate risks using Access Control Lists (ACLs) to filter anomalous Ethernet frames targeting the health monitoring subsystem. 

Conclusion: 

CVE-2025-20111 presents a significant risk to enterprise and data center networks relying on Cisco Nexus switches. While there is no known active exploitation, organizations should prioritize patching and mitigation strategies to prevent service disruptions. Proactive monitoring and adherence to Cisco’s security advisories will help ensure network resilience against potential exploitation. 

References: 

The Baltic Sea Ship Accident & not Sabotage; Highlights Ship Downtime Issues

Recently the undersea Fibre optic cable between Latvia and Sweden was damaged and reports said it was result of external influence which prompted NATO to deploy patrol ships to the area and triggering a sabotage investigation by Swedish authorities. Also the cargo ship Vezhen was  seized as part of the probe by Sweden’s Security Service.

The incident took place on Jan. 26 and was one of several in recent months, triggered a hunt for vessels suspected of involvement.

The prosecutor said the Vezhen’s anchor severed the cable but that the incident was related to a combination of bad weather, equipment deficiencies and poor seamanship. Images shared by Swedish media showed that the ship appeared to have a damaged anchor.

The cable belongs to Latvia’s state broadcaster, LVRTC, which said in a statement there had been “disruptions in data transmission services”, but that end users would be mostly unaffected.

A second vessel, the Silver Dania, a Norwegian cargo ship with an all-Russian crew, was seized in Norway at the request of Latvian authorities but was cleared of wrongdoing and released. Baltic Sea region is on high alert after a string of power cable, telecom link, and gas pipeline outages since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022.

We cannot deny the scope of Hybrid attack in the Baltic region that targeted critical undersea infrastructure (CUI), particularly fiber-optic cables, in the Baltic and Arctic regions since 2021. Mostly the prime suspect was Russia, but in this case the Vezhen ship was suspected to have incurred an accident and not sabotage, a Swedish prosecutor said on Monday, adding that the Maltese-flagged vessel had been released.

Ship downtime a major issue the marine industry faces

What is ship downtime and how does it affect?

Any breakdown in service during operation or runtime amounts to downtime in maritime industry.

Sometimes downtimes are unpredictable and unplanned which makes it harder as it incurs expenses to deal with. Repairs, emergency parts, and dry-docking fees can add up fast.

Importance of Data analytics:

This is where predictive maintenance and data analytics come into picture making it possible to provide an overview on what is pending task regarding maintenance of ship or other issues that needs immediate inspection. This can also be cyber security related issue or hybrid attacks targeting critical undersea infrastructure (CUI), particularly fiber-optic cables, have surged in the Baltic and Arctic regions.

The Baltic sea ship broke down due to combination of bad weather and and deficiencies in equipment and seamanship contributed to the cable break,” as per reports by investigators

Whether it’s an engine breakdown, a port delay, or a sudden maintenance issue, every hour of downtime costs money. And there are times when this hurts the most because you don’t see it coming and affecting profitability, delivery and supply chain disruptions.

Crew Issues – Fatigue-related mistakes or medical emergencies that delay voyages.

Mechanical Failures – Think engine breakdowns, generator issues, and propulsion failures.

Electrical Problems – A failed control system or communication outage.

Other problems falls under planned downtime

  • Routine Maintenance – Regular engine inspections, oil changes, and system checks.
  • Mandatory Surveys – Required ship inspections and certifications from regulatory authorities (like IMO).
  • Retrofits & Upgrades – Adding fuel-saving devices, ballast water treatment systems, or new tech.

Rise of Hybrid Attack on undersea cables in Baltic Sea and artic region

Since 2021 Russian hybrid attacks targeting critical undersea infrastructure (CUI), particularly fiber-optic cables, have surged in the Baltic and Arctic regions since 2021 causing disruptions threatening essential communication channels, exposing vulnerabilities of Northern Europe’s infrastructure.

More incidents were noticed in 2023 and 2024 involving Chinese vessels damaging Baltic subsea cables raise concerns over possible Russian-Chinese hybrid warfare collaboration despite no direct evidence confirming this, complicating Western deterrence efforts. (https://jamestown.org/program/hybrid-attacks-rise-on-undersea-cables-in-baltic-and-arctic-regions/)

Financial Implications

Any disruption of events that causes downtime in shipping such as piracy, bad weather and accidents blocking major shipping lanes causes major financial losses on global economy. Attacks such as cyber-attacks are growing with each passing day and quite predominant on risk landscape like the maritime industry, forcing organizations account of in its operations and work on legacy technologies replacing them with advanced technology systems to counter any attacks or sabotage or foul play.

Companies that have proven their ability to manage these risks and remain agile for recovery are more likely to secure favorable finance options.

Innovations in Maritime industry

Maritime transport is seen key player in global trade and the intricacies of networks of shipping
routes, ports, forced globalization to strengthened their operation strategies for the world economy to grow surpassing numerous challenges. Innovations is high on demand for safety systems form part of the ongoing development where digital based systems are part of ships in current scenario. E.g. the Intelligent awareness (IA) systems will be nex- gen of digital technologies to provide safety net for smooth operation of ships on transit that include utilizing sensors, high-resolution displays, and intelligent software.

Maritime chokepoints are critical points in shipping routes.as they facilitate substantial trade volumes and connect the world. Due to disruptions and very limited routes that are valid for ship passages there are negative impacts on supply chains, leading to systemic consequences, affecting food security, energy supply and whole of the global economy.

Sources: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/baltic-undersea-cable-damaged-by-external-influence-sunday-latvian-broadcaster-2025-01-26/

www.shipuniverse.com

Scroll to top