Threat actors

Scanners Turn Attack Vector as TrivyScanner Hijacked via GitHub Actions Tags

Attackers Targeted SSH keys, Cloud Tokens & API secrets in CI/CD Pipelines; Highlights Securing CI/CD Pipelines

In latest vulnerability discovery Aqua Security revealed HackerBot-claw bot hijacked 75 of 76 GitHub Actions tags for its Trivy vulnerability scanner. The HackerBot-claw first distributed credential-stealing malware through the widely used security tool for the second time in a one month.

Malicious code rode alongside legitimate scans, targeting SSH keys, cloud tokens and API secrets in CI/CD pipelines. Security researcher Paul McCarty was the first to warn publicly that Trivy version 0.69.4 had been backdoored, with malicious container images and GitHub releases published to users.

Attack module on Trivy

When it comes to workflow it has been observed that more then 10,000 GitHub workflow files rely on trivy-action. Attackers can leverage this pipeline and pull versions during the attack window which are affected and carry sensitive credentials exfiltrated.

Attackers compromised the GitHub Action by modifying its code and retroactively updating version tags to reference a malicious commit. This permitted data used in CI/CD workflows to be printed in GitHub Actions build logs and finally leaking credentials.

A self-propagating npm worm compromised 47 packages, extending the blast radius into the broader JavaScript ecosystem.

Aqua Security disclosed in a GitHub Discussion that the incident stemmed from incomplete containment of an earlier March 1 breach involving a hackerbot-claw bot.

  • Attackers swapped the entrypoint.sh in Trivy’s GitHub Actions with a 204-line script that prepended credential-stealing code before the legitimate scanner.
  • Lines 4 through 105 contained the infostealer payload, while lines 106 through 204 ran Trivy as normal.
  • This made difficult  to detect during routine scans.

TeamPCP preserved normal scan functionality to avoid triggering CI/CD failures as detection now will require cryptographic verification of commit signatures .

For defenders, traditional CI/CD monitoring, which watches for build failures or unexpected output, can no longer catch supply-chain compromises that deliberately maintain normal behavior.

Organizations relying on Trivy or similar open-source security tools are facing attacks from the very scanners meant to protect their pipelines can become the attack vector. Only cryptographic provenance checks can distinguish legitimate releases from poisoned ones.

As per security researchers once inside a pipeline, the malicious script scanned memory regions of the GitHub Actions Runner.

Github Compromise

The attack appears to have been accomplished via the compromise of the cx-plugins-releases (GitHub ID 225848595) service account, as that is the identity involved in publishing the malicious tags. 

Credentials exfiltrated during the initial incident were used last week in a new supply chain attack that targeted not only the Trivy package but also trivy-action and setup-trivy, Trivy’s maintainers have confirmed in a March 21 advisory.

Key Findings b Wiz Research

  • According to Wiz, the attack appears to have been carried out via the compromise of the “cx-plugins-releases” service account, with the attackers with malicious container images and GitHub releases published to users.
  • The second stage extension is activated and the malicious payload checks whether the victim has credentials from cloud service providers such as GitHub, AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.
  • When credentials if they are detected, it proceeds to fetch a next-stage payload from the same domain (“checkmarx[.]zone”).

“The payload attempts execution via npx, bunx, pnpx, or yarn dlx. This covers major JavaScript package managers,” Wiz researchers Rami McCarthy, James Haughom, and Benjamin Read said. “The retrieved package contains a comprehensive credential stealer.

Harvested credentials are then encrypted, using the keys as elsewhere in this campaign, and exfiltrated to ‘checkmarx[.]zone/vsx’ as tpcp.tar.gz.”

Conclusion: Aqua Security urged affected users to “treat all pipeline secrets as compromised and rotate immediately.” 

Organizations that ran any version of trivy-action, setup-trivy, or Trivy v0.69.4 during the attack window should audit their CI/CD logs for unexpected network connections to scan.aquasecurtiy[.]org and check whether any tpcp-docs repositories were created under their GitHub accounts.

With three major tag-hijacking incidents in 12 months, Wiz security researcher Rami McCarthy recommended that organizations “pin GitHub Actions to full SHA hashes, not version tags.”

Sources: Trivy Breached Twice in a Month via GitHub Actions

Evolving Phishing Scams & Cost Incurred by Organization’s in 2025

Any phishing scams that occur, the purpose is to trick unsuspecting victims or organizations into taking a specific action and that can range from clicking on malicious links, downloading harmful files or sharing login credentials. Sometimes the effectiveness of phishing attacks stems from their use of social engineering techniques that have the ability to exploit human psychology or behavior. In 2025 we have witnessed the how evolving phishing scams that have affected organizations financially.

Often we see phishing scams create a sense of urgency, or curiosity thereby prompting victims to act quickly without verifying the authenticity of incoming request. Now with evolving technology, phishing tactics are also evolving making these attacks increasingly sophisticated, hard to detect. In coming years we will witness how AI will power more phishing attacks, including text-based impersonations to deepfake communications. These will be more cheap and popular with threat actors.

Cyber security researchers found that there is a link between ransomware, malware and form encryption and most were caused by.

14% Malicious websites

54% Phishing

27% Poor user pactices / gullibility

26% Lack of cybersecurity training

A survey by Statista found that ransomware infections were caused by:

  • 54% Phishing
  • 27% Poor user pactices / gullibility
  • 26% Lack of cybersecurity training
  • 14% Malicious websites

In this blog we will highlight latest phishing statistics that emerged in 2025 ,affecting organizations and phishing scams are changing.

As per APWG report found on Unique phishing sites. This is a primary measure of reported phishing across the globe. This is determined by the unique bases of phishing URLs found in phishing emails reported to APWG’s repository.

In the first quarter of 2025, APWG observed 1,003,924 phishing attacks. This was the largest quarterly
total since 1.07 million were observed in Q4 2023. The number has climbed steadily over the last year:
from 877,536 in Q2 2024, to 932,923 in Q3, to 989,123 in Q4. One of the reason cited being advancement in AI is also making it easier for criminals to create convincing and personalized phishing lures.

Hoxhunt find alarming statistics on phishing related attack of 2025

Business email compromise (BEC)A staggering 64% of businesses report facing BEC attacks in 2024, with a typical financial loss averaging $150,000 per incident​. These phishing attacks frequently target employees with access to financial systems, mimicking executives or trusted contacts.
Credential phishingAround 80% of phishing campaigns aim to steal credentials, particularly targeting cloud-based services like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace. With the growing reliance on cloud platforms, cyber attackers leverage realistic fake login pages to deceive users.
HTTPS phishingAn increasing number of phishing sites now use HTTPS to appear legitimate. In 2024, approximately 80% of phishing websites feature HTTPS, complicating detection for users.
Voice phishing (vishing)Vishing attacks are growing in prevalence, with 30% of organizations reporting instances where threat actors used fake calls to impersonate officials or executives.
Quishing (QR code phishing)QR code phishing attacks (quishing) increased by 25% year-over-year, as attackers exploit physical spaces like posters or fake business cards to lure victims.
AI-driven attacksAI is powering phishing attacks, with deepfake impersonations increasing by 15% in the last year. These attacks often target high-value individuals in finance and HR.
Multi-channel phishingAttackers are increasingly exploiting platforms like Slack, Teams, and social media. Around 40% of phishing campaigns now extend beyond email, reflecting a shift to these channels.
Government agency impersonationPhishing emails mimicking government bodies such as the IRS or international tax agencies have increased by 35%. These often involve claims about overdue taxes or fines.
Phishing kitsThe availability of ready-to-use phishing kits on the dark web has risen by 50%, enabling less sophisticated attackers to deploy high-quality phishing schemes​.
Brand impersonationAttackers frequently impersonate well-known brands like Microsoft, Amazon, and Facebook, leveraging user trust. For example, over 44,750 phishing attacks specifically targeted Facebook by embedding its name in domains and subdomains​ over the past year.

Cost of Phishing attacks

According to the 2024 IBM / Ponemon Cost of a Data Breach study, the average annual cost of phishing rose by nearly 10% from 2024 to 2023, from $4.45m to $4.88m. That’s the biggest jump since the pandemic.

The IBM study reported the following costs:

  • Phishing breaches: $4.88M
  • Social engineering: $4.77M
  • BEC: $4.67M

The above-listed categories of cyber security breach costs are all related to people-targeted attacks. BEC, social engineering, and stolen credentials often contain a phishing element.

Barracuda research found that email remains the common attack vector for cyber threats and highlighted their key findings:

1 in 4 email messages are malicious or unwanted spam.

83% of malicious Microsoft 365 documents contain QR codes that lead to phishing websites.

20% of companies experience at least one account takeover (ATO) incident each month.

Nearly one-quarter of all HTML attachments are malicious and more than three-quarters of
companies are not actively preventing spoofed emails.

Bitcoin sextortion scams, an emerging trend, account for 12% of malicious PDF attachments.

Nearly half of all companies have not configured a DMARC policy, putting them at risk
of email spoofing, phishing attacks, and business email compromise.

The Barracuda research also found malicious one in four emails are either malicious or unwanted spam and malicious attachment is prevalent in various file.

An alarming 87% of binaries detected were malicious, highlighting the need for strict policies against executable files being sent via email, since they can directly install malware. Despite a relatively low total volume, HTML files have a high malicious rate of 23% and are often used for phishing and credential theft.

The research say that small businesses more vulnerable to email threats, due to limited cybersecurity resources, smaller IT teams and they rely on basic email security solutions. Small business may not have required solutions to handle sophisticated attacks, such as business email compromise (BEC), phishing and ransomware.

How Organizations can strengthen their defense

As organizations embark to strengthen their defenses, it’s crucial they don’t overlook the human element and Cybersecurity hygiene. That definitely starts by identifying security at every step starting from ensuring every user, machine or system that has right to access privileges.

Cybersecurity is as much a cultural issue as it is a technical one, as a single click can compromise an entire organization, behavior starts to shift from compliance to accountability 

Whenever there is a successful phishing attack, researchers emphasize that this attack succeeds by exploiting human trust and familiarity with corporate communication formats. Security awareness remains the most vigorous defense as the growing complexity of these campaigns indicates that phishing operations are increasingly automated, data-driven and adaptive.

Conclusion: As organizations move towards adopting AI, so as attackers to continuously refining their tactics, evade traditional security measures. In this scenario organizations must mitigate the risks by adopting a multi-layered approach to email security. This will include all from leveraging AI-driven threat detection, real-time monitoring and user awareness training.

Phishing Detection & DeepPhish

For organizations who reply on unlike traditional rule-based phishing detection, which relies on blacklists and predefined rules. DeepPhish is implemented, that continuously learns from new phishing attempts, making it highly adaptive and effective against evolving threats.

DeepPhish employs a multi-layered AI approach to detect phishing threats and theses include Email and Website Analysis,uses ML algorithms to analyze historical phishing attacks and identify new patterns and NLP helps DeepPhish analyze email content, message tone, and linguistic patterns that phishers use to trick users.

(Source: APWG.org)

(Source: https://www.barracuda.com/reports/2025-email-threats-report)

(Sources: hoxhunt.com)

Vulnerability Tracked in Oracle is being Exploited; CISA

CISA, the cyber security agency from US has added a serious vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite.As per CISA the flaw tracked in an Oracle E-Business Suite flaw tracked as CVE-2025-61884 is being exploited in attacks, adding it to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

Vulnerability CVE-2025-61884

Oracle published CVE-2025-61884, a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Oracle Configurator runtime component, on October 11.

The bug received a CVSS score of 7.5 and does not require authentication to exploit. According to the company, attackers can use this vulnerability to gain “unauthorized access to critical data or full access to all Oracle Configurator data.”

Government organizations in the US must install patches before November 10. However, Oracle itself has not yet confirmed the exploitation.

In early October, Mandiant revealed that the Clop ransomware gang had begun sending extortion emails to companies, claiming that they had stolen data from Oracle E-Business Suite instances using zero-day flaws.

Oracle responded to this news by stating that the threat actors had exploited previously patched flaws disclosed in July.

As per Bleeping computers CVE-2025-61884 addresses the flaw by validating an attacker-supplied “return_url” using a regular expression. If the validation fails, the request is blocked.

To this day, it remains unclear why Oracle listed the ShinyHunters exploit as an IOC for CVE-2025-61882, when it is actually intended for CVE-2025-61884.
Oracle EBS under attack

 Orcale E-Business Suit is under targeted atatck by threat actors and investigations by various research teams from Mandiant and Crowdstrike revealed that Oracle EBS had been targeted in two different campaigns.

  • July campaign: Used an exploit that targeted an SSRF flaw in the “/configurator/UiServlet” endpoint, which is now confirmed as CVE-2025-61884.
  • August campaign: Used a different exploit against the “/OA_HTML/SyncServlet” endpoint, and was fixed under CVE-2025-61882 through mod_security rules to block the endpoint and by stubbing out the SYNCSERVLET class. This flaw is attributed to Clop.

Oracle disclosed CVE-2025-61884 on October 11 but did not confirm whether it had been exploited, despite having fixed the exploit used in the July attacks. Earlier when the vulnerability CVE-2025-61884 was discovered concerns an information disclosure flaw in the Runtime UI component.

Last week Oracle released an emergency patch this weekend for a critical vulnerability in E-Business Suite. This software flaw can be exploited by attackers without authentication to steal sensitive data.Oracle has assigned the vulnerability a CVSS score of 7.5, which underscores the severity of the problem.

CISA also confirmed that five new vulnerabilities are actually being used to attack systems in the real world. These 5 new CVE’s hit everything from business apps to CMS platforms to core Windows components.

These are

  • Oracle EBS bugs give attackers an unauthenticated RCE path and data access through SSRF.
  • The SMB flaw enables lateral movement inside networks.
  • The Kentico pair lets attackers take over CMS environments used for staging and publishing.
  • The Apple vulnerability shows the ongoing risk of legacy systems that missed critical patches.

Threat Mitigation by Oracle E Business Suit when hunting for Threat indicators

• Look for weird patterns in Oracle EBS requests – could be a SSRF issue

• See if there are any spikes in SMB share privileges & check Kentico logs for anything fishy

• Browser logs are the place to look for JavaScriptCore crashes or just weird execution

Oracle released critical patch for a wide range of products and this include

The Critical Patch Update provides security updates for a wide range of product families: Oracle Database Server, Oracle Application Express, Oracle Blockchain Platform, Oracle GoldenGate, Oracle NoSQL Database, Oracle REST Data Services, Oracle Commerce, Oracle Communications Applications, Oracle Communications, Oracle Construction and Engineering, Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle Enterprise Manager, Oracle Financial Services Applications, Oracle Fusion Middleware, Oracle Analytics, Oracle Health Sciences Applications, Oracle HealthCare Applications, Oracle Hospitality Applications, Oracle Hyperion, Oracle Insurance Applications, Oracle Java SE, Oracle JD Edwards, Oracle MySQL, Oracle PeopleSoft, Oracle Retail Applications, Oracle Siebel CRM, Oracle Supply Chain, Oracle Systems, Oracle Utilities Applications, and Oracle Virtualization.

Sources: CISA confirms hackers exploited Oracle E-Business Suite SSRF flaw

October 2025 Critical Patch Update Released | security

CISA Warns Critical Cisco Firewall Vulnerabilities Under Active Exploitation  

4 Actively exploited Zero-days affecting millions of devices,. This include 3 targeted by Nation-state actor “ArcaneDoor”.

Security Advisory: Cisco has released critical security updates to address two zero-day vulnerabilities referring to CVE-2025-20333 and CVE-2025-20362 in the VPN web server of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software.

CISA has also added in their KEV catalog and including additional actions tailored to each agency’s status in Emergency Directive ED 25-03 document.

CISA said ‘”The campaign is widespread and involves exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities to gain unauthenticated remote code execution [RCE] on ASAs, as well as manipulating read-only memory (ROM) to persist through reboot and system upgrade,”.

CISA has reported that an advanced threat actor ArcaneDoor, threat actor has demonstrated a capability to successfully modify ASA ROM at least as early as 2024. These zero-day vulnerabilities in the Cisco ASA platform are also present in specific versions of Cisco Firepower appliances’ Secure Boot would detect the identified manipulation of the ROM.  

Severity Critical 
CVSS Score 9.9  
CVEs CVE-2025-20333, CVE-2025-20362 
POC Available No 
Actively Exploited Yes 
Exploited in Wild Yes 
Advisory Version 1.1 

Overview 

The flaws discovered are actively exploited in the wild which allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or access restricted endpoints without authentication. Admins are urged to immediately apply Cisco’s fixed releases to mitigate these actively exploited zero-day vulnerabilities 

Vulnerability Name CVE ID Product Affected Severity Fixed Version 
Buffer Overflow Vulnerability  CVE-2025-20333  Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA), Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD)  Critical Update to the latest version 
Missing Authorization Vulnerability CVE-2025-20362  Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA), Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Medium  Update to the latest version 

Technical Summary 

Cisco has released security updates to address multiple vulnerabilities in the VPN web server of Secure Firewall ASA and FTD Software.

The most severe issue is a critical remote code execution vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with valid VPN credentials to send specially crafted HTTP(S) requests and execute arbitrary code with root-level privileges, potentially resulting in full compromise of the affected device and control of its operations.

In addition, a medium-severity vulnerability was identified that could enable unauthenticated attackers to bypass access controls and access restricted web resources without authentication, potentially exposing sensitive information or limited administrative functions.

Both vulnerabilities are caused by improper validation of user-supplied HTTP(S) input, making them exploitable over the network.

Cisco has confirmed that there are no workarounds available, and administrators are strongly advised to upgrade to the fixed software versions immediately to ensure the security and integrity of their environments. 

CVE ID System Affected  Vulnerability Details Impact 
CVE-2025-20333  Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software, Cisco Secure FTD Software  Improper input validation in the VPN web server enables authenticated remote users to send crafted HTTP requests that allow arbitrary code execution with root privileges. Remote Code Execution  
CVE-2025-20362  Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software, Cisco Secure FTD Software  The VPN web server does not properly validate HTTP(S) user-supplied input. Attackers can exploit this by sending specially crafted requests to bypass authentication and access restricted URL endpoints. Unauthorized access  

Recommendations

  • Install the fixed software releases for Cisco Secure Firewall ASA and FTD Software 
  • Use the Cisco Software Checker to identify the earliest fixed release for your software version. 
  • Navigate the device management interface (Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center or Device Manager) to apply updates. 
  • Restart devices after installation and ensure auto-updates are enabled. 
  • Review the Configure Threat Detection for VPN Services section in the Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Firewall CLI Configuration Guide to enable protection against VPN-related attacks. 

Conclusion: 
These vulnerabilities present a significant risk as they are actively being exploited in the wild and can lead to complete system compromise or unauthorized access to sensitive resources.

Since no workarounds are available, applying the latest Cisco security updates is the only effective remediation. Administrators should prioritize immediate patching across all affected devices to protect their environment from ongoing exploitation attempts and ensure continued resilience of critical firewall infrastructure. 

References

Scroll to top