Author: Gargi

Samsung Galaxy S25 Zero-Day Exploit Exposes Camera & Location 

Summary 

At Pwn2Own Ireland 2025, researchers Ben R. and Georgi G. from Interrupt Labs successfully exploited a zero-day vulnerability in the Samsung Galaxy S25. The flaw allowed them to gain remote control of the device, activate the camera, and track the user’s real-time location without interaction.

This achievement, earning them $50,000 and 5 Master of Pwn points, highlighted ongoing security weaknesses even in flagship smartphones with extensive testing. The exploit’s discovery underlined broader concerns about the pace of Android feature development outstripping security hardening efforts across system and multimedia libraries. 

The Galaxy S25 zero-day exploit underscores the persistent threat of critical security flaws even in top-tier consumer devices. Although discovered in a controlled, ethical hacking event, such vulnerabilities pose substantial risks if leveraged by malicious actors.

Vulnerability Details 

The vulnerability originated from an improper input validation issue within the Galaxy S25’s software stack. Through carefully crafted malicious inputs, the researchers bypassed Samsung’s built-in security safeguards and executed arbitrary code remotely.

The exploit provided persistent access, enabling control over cameras, GPS, and potentially other sensitive device components, effectively transforming the smartphone into a covert surveillance tool. Because the issue existed at a deep system level, it required no user interaction, making it particularly severe. The vulnerability had not been previously disclosed, meaning Samsung and the public were both unaware until the competition’s revelation. 

Key characteristics: 

The key characteristics of the Samsung Galaxy S25 zero-day vulnerability are as follows: 

  • Type of Vulnerability: Improper input validation bug within the device’s software stack, allowing remote code execution without user interaction.​ 
  • Impact: Enables attackers to take full control of the device, activate the camera, and track real-time GPS location, effectively turning the device into a surveillance tool.​ 
  • Discovery and Exploit: Uncovered during Pwn2Own Ireland 2025 by researchers Ben R. and Georgi G., showcasing a sophisticated exploit chain that bypassed Samsung’s security measures.​ 
  • Persistence: Vulnerability allows persistent access, which can be exploited silently without user awareness or interaction.​ 
  • Disclosure and Remediation: The flaw was previously undisclosed, with responsible disclosure leading to Samsung preparing a security patch. No official statement has been issued yet, but a fix is anticipated.​ 
  • Severity and Potential Damage: The exploit can compromise sensitive personal data, private communications, and location, highlighting significant privacy and security risks. 

Attack Flow 

Step Description 
1. Craft Malicious Input  Attackers develop specially crafted malicious inputs targeting the vulnerable components within the Samsung Galaxy S25’s software stack, particularly exploiting the improper input validation flaw. 
2. Deliver Payload The malicious payload is delivered via crafted multimedia or system input, such as manipulated images or software commands, that bypass Samsung’s existing safeguards. 
3. Bypass Security Measures The input validation flaw allows the malicious data to bypass security checks, executing remote code without requiring user interaction or consent, gaining initial access to the device’s system. 
4. Gain Persistent Control Once the malicious code executes, attackers establish persistent control over the device, enabling continuous access to core functionalities like camera activation and GPS tracking silently and covertly. 
5. Exploit Device Capabilities Attackers leverage control to activate the device’s camera and GPS in real-time, turning the device into a surveillance tool capable of capturing photos, videos, and tracking location discreetly. 
6. Maintain Stealth & Avoid Detection The exploit chain is designed to evade detection by Samsung’s defenses during the attack window, allowing attackers to operate covertly without triggering security alerts or user notifications. 
7. Exploit and Monetize The compromised device becomes a tool for espionage, data theft, or targeted surveillance, which can be exploited for malicious purposes or sold on criminal markets if attacker exploits are monetized. 

Proof-of-Concept 

The proof-of-concept for the Samsung Galaxy S25 zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-21043) demonstrates how specially crafted malicious images can exploit an out-of-bounds write flaw in Samsung’s closed-source image parsing library libimagecodec.quram.so. This flaw allows remote code execution with elevated privileges without requiring user interaction.

The exploit involves delivering a malicious payload embedded in an image file that, when processed by the vulnerable library, triggers memory corruption leading to arbitrary code execution and persistent control over the device.

This has been confirmed in cybersecurity forums and independent analyses, with active exploitation observed in the wild primarily via social engineering through messaging platforms like WhatsApp. The PoC confirms that attackers can bypass conventional security mechanisms and gain deep system control, enabling surveillance actions such as camera activation and location tracking. This underscores the critical need for applying the latest security patches released by Samsung.  

Source: https://x.com/thezdi/status/1981316237897396298 

Why It’s Effective 

  • Code Execution via Input Validation Flaw: Exploits improper input validation within the Galaxy S25’s software stack, allowing malicious payloads to bypass safeguards and execute remote code seamlessly alongside legitimate system processes. 
  • Zero-Click Capability: Operates without requiring any user interaction, enabling silent compromise through automated payloads that trigger upon data processing or system-level input handling. 
  • Persistent Access: Establishes continuous control after initial compromise, granting long-term ability to activate hardware components like camera and GPS without detection by standard security mechanisms. 
  • Stealth Operations: Exploit chain hides within multimedia and system library processes, avoiding visible alerts or performance anomalies that might indicate compromise to the user. 
  • Advanced Evasion: Utilizes legitimate system libraries and resource calls, reducing the likelihood of being flagged by mobile antivirus or Samsung Knox runtime protections. 
  • High Impact Vector: Enables complete device surveillance, capturing photos, videos, and location data covertly, illustrating real-world severity when attackers weaponize such system-level access. 

Remediation

  • Update Samsung Galaxy devices immediately with the latest September 2025 Security Maintenance Release (SMR) patch that fixes CVE-2025-21043. 
  • Manually check for software updates via Settings > Software Update > Download and Install to ensure the fix is applied promptly. 
  • Enable automatic security updates on Samsung devices for timely future patching without delay. 
  • For enterprises, enforce patch deployment policies through Mobile Device Management (MDM) or Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) tools to cover all mobile endpoints. 
  • Restrict app permissions, especially camera and location access, to minimize exposure in case of compromise. 
  • Avoid opening images from untrusted sources or suspicious messaging apps, as the vulnerability exploits image parsing. 
  • Implement continuous mobile threat detection to identify abnormal device behavior indicative of compromise. 
  • Educate users and IT teams about the critical nature of this vulnerability and the importance of timely patching. 

This ensures comprehensive mitigation of vulnerability while reducing risk and exposure to active exploits. 

Conclusion: 


This incident reinforces the value of responsible disclosure mechanisms like Pwn2Own, where manufacturers receive detailed technical reports to develop patches before public release. Samsung has yet to issue a formal statement but is expected to roll out a security update imminently.

In the meantime, users are advised to enable automatic updates, remain cautious with app permissions and untrusted networks, and monitor official channels for patches to mitigate potential exploitation risks. 

References

Microsoft Teams Access Token Vulnerability Allows Attack Vector for Data Exfiltration

Summary: Microsoft Teams Access Token Vulnerability: New Attack Vector for Data Exfiltration

A recently uncovered vulnerability in Microsoft Teams for Windows allows attackers with local access to extract encrypted authentication tokens, granting unauthorized access to chats, emails and SharePoint files.

This technique, detailed by researcher Brahim El Fikhi on October 23, 2025, leverages the Windows Data Protection API (DPAPI) to decrypt tokens stored in a Chromium-like Cookies database.

Attackers can use these tokens for impersonation, lateral movement, or social engineering, bypassing recent security enhancements and posing significant risks to enterprise environments.

Vulnerability Details

The vulnerability, identified in Microsoft Teams desktop applications, involves the extraction of encrypted access tokens stored in the SQLite Cookies database at %AppData%\Local\Packages\MSTeams_8wekyb3d8bbwe\LocalCache\Microsoft\MSTeams\EBWebView\Cookies. Unlike earlier versions that stored tokens in plaintext (a flaw exposed by Vectra AI in 2022), current versions use AES-256-GCM encryption protected by DPAPI, tied to user or machine credentials. However, attackers with local access can decrypt these tokens using tools like ProcMon and Mimikatz, exploiting the embedded msedgewebview2.exe process that handles authentication via login.microsoftonline.com.

Source: blog.randorisec.fr, cybersecuritynews
Attack Flow

StepDescription
CraftAttackers use ProcMon to monitor msedgewebview2.exe and identify the Cookies database write operations.
AccessThe ms-teams.exe process is terminated to unlock the Cookies file, which is locked during operation.
ExtractThe encrypted token is retrieved from the Cookies database, with fields like host_key (e.g., teams.microsoft.com), name, and encrypted_value (prefixed with “v10”).
DecryptThe DPAPI-protected master key is extracted from %AppData%\Local\Packages\MSTeams_8wekyb3d8bbwe\LocalCache\Microsoft\MSTeams\EBWebView\Local State and decrypted using Windows APIs or tools like Mimikatz.
ExploitDecrypted tokens are used with tools like GraphSpy to access Teams chats, send messages, read emails, or interact with SharePoint via Microsoft Graph API

Why It’s Effective

  • Local Access Exploitation: The attack requires only local access, achievable via malware or compromised endpoints, bypassing MFA and remote defenses.
  • Stealthy Execution: The use of standard Windows APIs (DPAPI) and embedded browser processes evades traditional monitoring.
  • Authority Abuse: Tokens enable impersonation through trusted APIs, amplifying risks of phishing or data theft via Teams, Outlook, or SharePoint.

Recommendations:

  • Monitor Processes Deploy EDR rules to detect abnormal ms-teams.exe terminations or msedgewebview2.exe file writes.
  • Enforce Encryption – Use app-bound encryption and prefer web-based Teams to avoid local token storage.
  • Token Rotation – Implement Entra ID policies to rotate access tokens regularly and audit Graph API logs for anomalies.
  • Limit Privileges – Restrict local admin access to prevent DPAPI key extraction.
  • User Awareness – Train users to recognize phishing attempts via Teams or email, especially those leveraging impersonation

Conclusion:
This vulnerability underscores the evolving threat landscape for collaboration platforms like Microsoft Teams. As attackers refine techniques to exploit trusted systems, organizations must enhance endpoint monitoring and adopt stricter access controls. By implementing the outlined mitigations, security teams can reduce the risk of token-based attacks and safeguard sensitive data.

References:

Vulnerability Tracked in Oracle is being Exploited; CISA

CISA, the cyber security agency from US has added a serious vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite.As per CISA the flaw tracked in an Oracle E-Business Suite flaw tracked as CVE-2025-61884 is being exploited in attacks, adding it to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

Vulnerability CVE-2025-61884

Oracle published CVE-2025-61884, a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Oracle Configurator runtime component, on October 11.

The bug received a CVSS score of 7.5 and does not require authentication to exploit. According to the company, attackers can use this vulnerability to gain “unauthorized access to critical data or full access to all Oracle Configurator data.”

Government organizations in the US must install patches before November 10. However, Oracle itself has not yet confirmed the exploitation.

In early October, Mandiant revealed that the Clop ransomware gang had begun sending extortion emails to companies, claiming that they had stolen data from Oracle E-Business Suite instances using zero-day flaws.

Oracle responded to this news by stating that the threat actors had exploited previously patched flaws disclosed in July.

As per Bleeping computers CVE-2025-61884 addresses the flaw by validating an attacker-supplied “return_url” using a regular expression. If the validation fails, the request is blocked.

To this day, it remains unclear why Oracle listed the ShinyHunters exploit as an IOC for CVE-2025-61882, when it is actually intended for CVE-2025-61884.
Oracle EBS under attack

 Orcale E-Business Suit is under targeted atatck by threat actors and investigations by various research teams from Mandiant and Crowdstrike revealed that Oracle EBS had been targeted in two different campaigns.

  • July campaign: Used an exploit that targeted an SSRF flaw in the “/configurator/UiServlet” endpoint, which is now confirmed as CVE-2025-61884.
  • August campaign: Used a different exploit against the “/OA_HTML/SyncServlet” endpoint, and was fixed under CVE-2025-61882 through mod_security rules to block the endpoint and by stubbing out the SYNCSERVLET class. This flaw is attributed to Clop.

Oracle disclosed CVE-2025-61884 on October 11 but did not confirm whether it had been exploited, despite having fixed the exploit used in the July attacks. Earlier when the vulnerability CVE-2025-61884 was discovered concerns an information disclosure flaw in the Runtime UI component.

Last week Oracle released an emergency patch this weekend for a critical vulnerability in E-Business Suite. This software flaw can be exploited by attackers without authentication to steal sensitive data.Oracle has assigned the vulnerability a CVSS score of 7.5, which underscores the severity of the problem.

CISA also confirmed that five new vulnerabilities are actually being used to attack systems in the real world. These 5 new CVE’s hit everything from business apps to CMS platforms to core Windows components.

These are

  • Oracle EBS bugs give attackers an unauthenticated RCE path and data access through SSRF.
  • The SMB flaw enables lateral movement inside networks.
  • The Kentico pair lets attackers take over CMS environments used for staging and publishing.
  • The Apple vulnerability shows the ongoing risk of legacy systems that missed critical patches.

Threat Mitigation by Oracle E Business Suit when hunting for Threat indicators

• Look for weird patterns in Oracle EBS requests – could be a SSRF issue

• See if there are any spikes in SMB share privileges & check Kentico logs for anything fishy

• Browser logs are the place to look for JavaScriptCore crashes or just weird execution

Oracle released critical patch for a wide range of products and this include

The Critical Patch Update provides security updates for a wide range of product families: Oracle Database Server, Oracle Application Express, Oracle Blockchain Platform, Oracle GoldenGate, Oracle NoSQL Database, Oracle REST Data Services, Oracle Commerce, Oracle Communications Applications, Oracle Communications, Oracle Construction and Engineering, Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle Enterprise Manager, Oracle Financial Services Applications, Oracle Fusion Middleware, Oracle Analytics, Oracle Health Sciences Applications, Oracle HealthCare Applications, Oracle Hospitality Applications, Oracle Hyperion, Oracle Insurance Applications, Oracle Java SE, Oracle JD Edwards, Oracle MySQL, Oracle PeopleSoft, Oracle Retail Applications, Oracle Siebel CRM, Oracle Supply Chain, Oracle Systems, Oracle Utilities Applications, and Oracle Virtualization.

Sources: CISA confirms hackers exploited Oracle E-Business Suite SSRF flaw

October 2025 Critical Patch Update Released | security

WatchGuard Patched Critical Vulnerability, Allowing RCE in Firebox Appliances 

Security Advisory : A critical vulnerability has been found in WatchGuard Firebox appliances that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code through an out-of-bounds write in the IKEv2 VPN process.

OEM WatchGuard 
Severity Critical 
CVSS Score 9.3 
CVEs CVE-2025-9242 
POC Available No 
Actively Exploited No 
Exploited in Wild No 
Advisory Version 1.0 

Overview 

The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-9242, which affects multiple Fireware OS versions. Users and administrators are strongly advised to upgrade to the latest patched versions of Fireware OS immediately to stay protected. 

Vulnerability Name CVE ID Product Affected Severity Fixed Version 
​Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability in IKEv2 Process  CVE-2025-9242 WatchGuard Firebox Appliances with Fireware OS Critical v2025.1.1, v12.11.4, v12.5.13 (T15 & T35 models), 12.3.1_Update3 (FIPS-certified) 

Technical Summary 

Malicious actors could exploit this due to an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the WatchGuard Fireware OS iked process.

Remote unauthenticated attackers can send crafted IKE_SA_INIT and IKE_SA_AUTH packets to trigger a stack-based buffer overflow in the ike2_ProcessPayload_CERT function, overflowing a 520-byte stack buffer without proper bounds checking.

This impacts VPN setups using IKEv2 or dynamic gateways and can continue even after deleting them if any static peers are still active on UDP port 500. 

CVE ID System Affected  Vulnerability Details Impact 
CVE-2025- 9242 WatchGuard Firebox Appliances with Fireware OS 11.10.2-11.12.4_Update1, 12.0-12.11.3, 2025.1 Insufficient bounds checking in IKEv2 negotiations allows oversized identification payloads to cause buffer overflow, enabling control flow hijacking and ROP chains for code execution Arbitrary Code Execution, System Compromise,  Data Exfiltration,  Ransomware Deployment, Pivoting to Internal Networks 

Recommendations: 

You can update to the latest versions from the below table 

Vulnerable Version Resolved Version 
2025.1 2025.1.1 
12.x 12.11.4 
12.5.x (T15 & T35 models) 12.5.13 
12.3.1 (FIPS-certified release) 12.3.1_Update3 (B722811) 
11.x End of Life 

Here are some recommendations below –  

  • Disable unnecessary IKEv2 VPN configurations and restrict access to trusted networks only. 
  • Monitor logs for anomalous traffic. 
  • Implement network segmentation to limit lateral movement and regularly audit VPN setups. 

Conclusion: 
This critical vulnerability in WatchGuard Firebox appliances could allow remote attackers to achieve code execution and compromise perimeter defenses.

Although no exploits are in the wild but its unauthenticated nature and detailed public analysis make it a significant security risk requiring immediate action. Upgrading to the fixed version and applying recommended mitigations are strongly advised to ensure organizational security. 

References

TP-Link Security Update, Omada Gateway Exploits Fixed in October Release 

Summary: TP-Link’s October 2025 security updates fixes 4 vulnerabilities in its Omada Gateway devices, including multiple models commonly used in business networks.

OEM TP-Link 
Severity Critical 
CVSS Score 9.3 
CVEs CVE-2025-6541, CVE-2025-6542, CVE-2025-7850, CVE-2025-7851 
Date of Announcement 2025-10-21 
Actively Exploited No 
Exploited in Wild No 
Advisory Version 1.0 

Overview: 

The vulnerabilities allow attackers to execute remote commands, even without authentication, potentially compromising systems. Some vulnerabilities also let authenticated users inject commands or gain root access, which could lead to traffic interception, configuration changes or malware installation. Security teams are advised to update firmware immediately, review network configurations and change passwords to reduce the risk of exploitation. 

Vulnerability Name CVE ID Product Affected Severity CVSS Score 
OS Command Injection Vulnerability CVE-2025-6542 TP-Link Omada Gateways Critical 9.3 
Command Injection Vulnerability CVE-2025-7850 TP-Link Omada Gateways Critical 9.3 

Technical Summary: 

TP-Link Omada Gateways allows attackers to run arbitrary commands. The most critical one, CVE-2025-6542, a remote attacker can take full control of the device without logging in through the web interface. Another one allows logged-in users to inject commands and gain root access. The issues show the risks of exposed management portals. TP-Link recommends updating firmware, limiting network access and monitoring systems for any signs of attack. 

CVE ID System Affected  Vulnerability Details Impact 
CVE-2025-6542 TP-Link Omada Gateways (ER605, ER7206, ER8411 & Others) Unauthenticated remote attackers can execute arbitrary OS commands on the device Remote Code Execution,  System Compromise, Malware Deployment 
CVE-2025-7850 TP-Link Omada Gateways (ER7412-M2, ER7212PC, & Others) Command injection exploitable after admin authentication on the web portal System Compromise,  Root-Level Control 

Additional Vulnerabilities: 

The following high-severity vulnerabilities were also addressed in October 2025 TP-Link security updates for Omada Gateways – 

Vulnerability Name CVE ID Affected Component Severity 
Authenticated Arbitrary OS Command Execution in Omada Gateways CVE-2025-6541 TP-Link Omada Gateways High 
Root Shell Access Under Restricted Conditions in Omada Gateways CVE-2025-7851 TP-Link Omada Gateways High 

Remediation: 

Install the October 2025 firmware updates immediately via the TP-Link support portal to mitigate risks. Here is the below table with the updated version information for the models. 

Model Affected Versions Fixed Version 
ER8411 < 1.3.3 Build 20251013 Rel.44647 >= 1.3.3 Build 20251013 Rel.44647 
ER7412-M2 < 1.1.0 Build 20251015 Rel.63594 >= 1.1.0 Build 20251015 Rel.63594 
ER707-M2 < 1.3.1 Build 20251009 Rel.67687 >= 1.3.1 Build 20251009 Rel.67687 
ER7206 < 2.2.2 Build 20250724 Rel.11109 >= 2.2.2 Build 20250724 Rel.11109 
ER605 < 2.3.1 Build 20251015 Rel.78291 >= 2.3.1 Build 20251015 Rel.78291 
ER706W < 1.2.1 Build 20250821 Rel.80909 >= 1.2.1 Build 20250821 Rel.80909 
ER706W-4G < 1.2.1 Build 20250821 Rel.82492 >= 1.2.1 Build 20250821 Rel.82492 
ER7212PC < 2.1.3 Build 20251016 Rel.82571 >= 2.1.3 Build 20251016 Rel.82571 
G36 < 1.1.4 Build 20251015 Rel.84206 >= 1.1.4 Build 20251015 Rel.84206 
G611 < 1.2.2 Build 20251017 Rel.45512 >= 1.2.2 Build 20251017 Rel.45512 
FR365 < 1.1.10 Build 20250626 Rel.81746 >= 1.1.10 Build 20250626 Rel.81746 
FR205 < 1.0.3 Build 20251016 Rel.61376 >= 1.0.3 Build 20251016 Rel.61376 
FR307-M2 < 1.2.5 Build 20251015 Rel.76743 >= 1.2.5 Build 20251015 Rel.76743 

Here are some recommendations below 

  • Restrict network access to the management interface and enable trusted networks only. 
  • Apply least privilege principles and regular security audits for network devices. 
  • Disable remote management if not required and segment networks to limit lateral movement. 

Conclusion: 

There is no active exploitation noticed but organizations must prioritize firmware updates to prevent data breaches, malware and intrusions. Security teams should deploy updates immediately, enhance monitoring and implement mitigations to safeguard critical infrastructure. 

References

 

Unpatched Systems, Software’s Exposes Business to Cyber Threats

Remember when Qantas, Australia’s flagship airline confirmed a cyberattack exposing data from its frequent flyer program and customer accounts. The data was upto 6 million, which is staggering in number. This means any kind of exploits are malicious programs designed to take advantage of bugs or vulnerabilities in unpatched software or operating systems to gain unauthorised access. When left unpatched, these weak points act as open doors for cybercriminals.

Kaspersky research shows that the share of exploits targeting critical vulnerabilities in operating systems reached 64% in Q2 2025 (up from 48% in Q1 2025), with third-party apps (29%) and browsers (7%) following.

Unpatched Systems, Software’s exposes Business to Cyber Threats

The breach originated from a third-party customer service platform, proving that even indirect systems can expose millions of records we all knew. This was a clear case how unpatched software’s but Qantas denied any of its service platform was vulnerable and there was no sign the platform was compromised.

Similarly 1.5 billion records across 760 global companies record exposed to data breach when Salesforce was hit and the hacking group claimed to have breached Salesforce through compromised integrations with third-party tools like Drift and SalesLoft, stealing huge amounts of CRM data. And as recent Salesloft Drift cyberattack may have also compromised some Google Workspace accounts.

The above case are all about software vulnerabilities when left unpatched. Latest data from cybersecurity and privacy company Kaspersky revealed that existing vulnerabilities in business networks continue to leave Malaysian enterprises exposed to cyberattacks.

Globally, in Q2 2025, the most common exploits targeted vulnerable Microsoft Office products with unpatched security flaws, according to Kaspersky’s findings. Its solutions detected the most exploits on the Windows platform for the following vulnerabilities:

  • CVE-2018-0802: Remote code execution vulnerability in the Equation Editor component
  • CVE-2017-11882: Another remote code execution vulnerability in Equation Editor
  • CVE-2017-0199: Vulnerability in Microsoft Office and WordPad allowing attackers to gain control of the system

(Source: Kaspersky: Unpatched Systems Expose Malaysian Businesses To Exploits – TechTRP)

The report also revealed that the top 10 most exploited vulnerabilities included both new zero-day flaws and older unpatched issues that organisations continue to overlook. A zero-day vulnerability is a software flaw discovered by attackers before the vendor is aware of it. As no patch exists at the time, zero-day attacks often succeed.

Key findings from Kaspersky reports to secure your unpatched systems

  • Increased Exploitation: In the first half of 2025, more Windows and Linux users encountered vulnerability exploits compared to the previous year.
  • Targeted Vulnerabilities: Common exploits in Q2 2025 targeted Microsoft Office products with unpatched security flaws, such as those in the Equation Editor (CVE-2018-0802 and CVE-2017-11882).
  • End of Support: The end of free support for Windows 10 means millions of users will no longer receive critical security patches, leaving their systems vulnerable to new threats.
  • High volume of attacks: Kaspersky solutions blocked over 700,000 exploits targeting Indian organizations in the first half of 2025, averaging more than 4,000 per day

Attackers increasingly use methods to escalate privileges and exploit weaknesses in digital systems. As the number of vulnerabilities continues to grow, it is very important to constantly prioritize patching known vulnerabilities and use software that can mitigate post-exploitation actions. CISOs should counter the consequences of exploitation by searching for and neutralizing command and control implants that can be used by attackers on a compromised system,” says Alexander Kolesnikov, a security expert at Kaspersky.

What Businesses can do to remain Secure from Cyber threats when systems are unpatched?

For legacy systems and applications there is a lack ongoing vendor support, leaving remote code execution vulnerabilities open for exploitation. These attacks enable full system control with little user interaction.

How to Fix:

Apply host-based intrusion prevention and patch virtualization and replace or containerize legacy apps. It is important to isolate critical workloads in secure enclaves as being in legacy catagory they are prone to any kind of cyber threats and intrusion.

Follow more below recommendations

Conduct 24/7 monitoring of your infrastructure, focusing on perimeter defenses and using tools that can detect and block malicious software.

  • Utilize solutions for vulnerability assessment, patch management
  • Prioritize defense strategies & threat detection like phishing emails and web threats
  • Deploy comprehensive cybersecurity solutions that include incident response, employee training, and access to updated threat intelligence.
  • Implement a robust patch management process

Advanced eBPF Rootkit LinkPro Evade Detection in Linux Systems via Magic TCP Packets

Overview: LinkPro rootkit targets GNU/Linux systems: LinkPro is a newly discovered Linux rootkit that leverages eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) technology to stealthily hide its presence on infected systems. The sophisticated Linux rootkit linkpro was uncovered by Synacktiv CSIRT during an investigation of a compromised AWS infrastructure and evade detection in Linux Systems.

This threat was deployed in an AWS environment after attackers exploited a vulnerable Jenkins server to distribute a malicious Docker image containing a Rust downloader that fetched a memory-resident vShell backdoor. This rootkit’s use of eBPF, a legitimate kernel feature, makes detection challenging in Linux as it operates at a low level within the Linux kernel. 

Leveraging extended Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF) technology, where linkpro backdoor evades detection by hiding its processes and network activity, activating remotely via a “magic packet.”

Source: www.synacktiv.com 

Issues Details: The attack, originating from a vulnerable Jenkins server, deployed a malicious Docker image across AWS EKS clusters, enabling credential theft and lateral movement. This highlights the misuse of ebpf for advanced persistent threats (apts) in cloud environments. 

The LinkPro rootkit targets GNU/Linux systems, exploiting eBPF kernel capabilities to achieve stealth and remote activation.

It embeds multiple ELF modules, including two eBPF programs that hook into critical kernel system calls like getdents and sys_bpf to hide files, processes, and its own presence from detection tools.

If kernel support for these hooks is unavailable, LinkPro falls back to user-space concealment by loading a malicious shared library via /etc/ld.so.preload. This sophisticated rootkit deploys an advanced network packet filtering mechanism, activating only upon receiving a specific “magic packet” (a TCP SYN with a window size of 54321), allowing the attacker to control the system covertly. 

LinkPro masquerades as the legitimate systemd-resolved service for persistence and uses encrypted channels such as HTTP, DNS tunneling, and raw TCP/UDP for command and control. Its design enables attackers to execute arbitrary commands, perform file operations, and establish proxy tunnels, making it a highly adaptable and stealthy tool for persistent intrusions targeting cloud-native Linux systems. 

Attack Flow 

IOCs 

IOC Type Indicator Description 
  Network /api/client/file/download?Path=… URL used to download tools/payloads onto the compromised host. 
/reverse/handshake /reverse/heartbeat /reverse/operation Endpoints the implant calls in reverse mode to receive operator commands. 
18.199.101.111 Destination IP used by LinkPro in forward (active) mode. 
   File /etc/systemd/system/systemd-resolveld.service Malicious systemd service file named to look like systemd-resolved. 
/root/.tmp~data.ok Location/name of the LinkPro binary, disguised as a system file. 
/usr/lib/.system/.tmp~data.resolveld Alternate disguised location for the LinkPro binary. 
/etc/libld.so Malicious library loaded via /etc/ld.so.preload as a fallback concealment method. 
   Host Systemd-resolveld Fake service name intended to be mistaken for systemd-resolved. 
Conf_map eBPF map holding the internal port used by the Knock module. 
Knock_map eBPF map containing authorized IP addresses for the Knock module. 
Main_ebpf_progs eBPF map listing programs that the Hide module manages. 
Pids_to_hide_map eBPF map listing process IDs the rootkit hides. 
Hashes D5b2202b7308b25bda8e106552dafb8b6e739ca62287ee33ec77abe4016e698b Passive linkpro backdoor 
1368f3a8a8254feea14af7dc928af6847cab8fcceec4f21e0166843a75e81964 Active linkpro backdoor 
B11a1aa2809708101b0e2067bd40549fac4880522f7086eb15b71bfb322ff5e7 Ld_Preload module (libld.so) 
B8c8f9888a8764df73442ea78393fe12464e160d840c0e7e573f5d9ea226e164 Hide ebpf module 
364c680f0cab651bb119aa1cd82fefda9384853b1e8f467bcad91c9bdef097d3 Knock ebpf module 
0da5a7d302ca5bc15341f9350a130ce46e18b7f06ca0ecf4a1c37b4029667dbb Vget downloader 

Recommendations

Here are some recommendations below 

  • Patch the vulnerable Jenkins server (CVE-2024-23897) to prevent initial access. 
  • Restrict public exposure of CI/CD tools and enforce strict network segmentation. 
  • Monitor for suspicious Docker container deployments and unexpected host filesystem mounts. 
  • Watch for unusual or unauthorized eBPF program activity using kernel auditing tools. 
  • Regularly update Linux kernels and apply available security patches. 

Conclusion: 
The LinkPro rootkit is anadvanced Linux malware that uses eBPF at the kernel level to stay hidden and persist on systems.

It spreads through Jenkins vulnerabilities, container escapes and remote activation,  highlighting the critical vigilance organizations must maintain to continuously monitor and secure their environments.

To protect against it, companies should focus on timely patching and monitoring suspicious activities. 

References

1400 Websites Pulled Apart by German Authorities For Cyber-trading fraud; How Volatile for Users

Are you planning to trade in online related digital assets , well you might think twice as chances are you might fall in scammers lap where fake traders exploit retail traders who are seeking quick gains amid volatile crypto and stock markets.

According to sources 1400 illegal online trading domains/ websites operating out of Eastern Europe and Germany, marking one of the largest coordinated crackdowns on cyber-trading fraud in the region. “Operation Heracles,” name given took offline 1,406 active illegal domains in cooperation with the European police authority Europol and Bulgarian law enforcement authorities. German investigators and banking watchdog BaFin decided to shut down these websites after the Cyber-trading fraud came to light.

Modus Operandi by Scammers

Firstly users were lured with good returns and sophisticated online ads and social media campaigns before being connected to brokers working from call centers abroad. The shuttered websites displayed huge returns and exciting offers and convinced victims to invest substantial sums, often promising high returns through forex, crypt, or stock trading.

The scammers open fake trading platforms without a license from the BaFin and use call centers to encourage victims to invest money in the scheme.

The scammers posed as international agency but deliberately targeted the German market and people residing in Germany. Since the affected websites were redirected on October 3, authorities have recorded around 866,000 hits on the seized pages, showing the scale of the issue.

The site’s users were directed to brokers operating from overseas call centers, who then persuaded them to invest large amounts of funds. Many victims just realized after months that their money had never actually been invested, authorities said.

“The perpetrators are getting more professional,” said Birgit Rodolphe from BaFin. They use artificial intelligence to create mass illegal sites and trap investors to invest money.

(Sources: German authorities nix 1,400 websites used for cybertrading fraud | Reuters)

The operation follows the closure of 800 illegal domains in June this year. Since then, there have been around 20 million attempts to access the sites that have been blocked.

The Alarming Rise of Online Cyber-fraud

The digital world offers incredible opportunities for earning within short time and scammers are lurking every where while harboring sinister plan reminding of stark dangers.

This incident serves as a crucial warning to anyone considering online investments

Here are few important guidelines to protect yourself from similar trading fraud:

  • If you get unrealistic promises of high returns There is certainly a scam with unrealistic returns. All legitimate investments carry some degree of risk.
  • Be extremely wary of unexpected calls, messages, or emails from individuals or groups promoting investment opportunities.
  • Scammers will use tactics creating a sense of urgency, urging to invest quickly and avoid getting you to scan whole documents or contracts etc.
  • Keep verifying any legitimacy of any trading application or website, if they have regulatory licenses or watch for any sign of unprofessionalism.
  • Watch if they send requests for transfers to Personal Accounts. Any legitimate investment firms will never ask you to transfer money into personal bank accounts. All transactions should go through official, regulated channels.
  • Fraudsters often impersonate famous financial institutions or advisors and its important one should always cross-reference their claims.

It is important that you report the issue to the police ASAP. You will need a crime number from the police to help you work with your bank and other organizations.

Approaches to dealing with cybercrime-related financial loss

How you can try and get your money back very much depends on how the money was stolen. Here we are going to focus on four different approaches:

1) Authorised payments (where you were tricked into making a payment),

2) Unauthorised payments (where the criminal actually carried out the payment using your accounts),

3) ID fraud (where you have been impersonated with a financial organisation) and

4) card fraud (where they money was transferred by a credit or debit card payment).

Cyber Threats in Maritime Domain; National Security in Focus at Delhi Seminar

Seminar Titled ‘Impact of Cyber Attacks on Maritime Sector and its Effects on National Security and International Relations’ 

The event in Delhi organized by Indian Navy and address cyber threat on the Maritime domain and how the threats are aligned to national security and their impact.

The event organized at a time when geo -politics is evolving and the seminar aims to deepen understanding of cyber threats in the maritime domain and foster collaboration amongst key stakeholders to enhance cybersecurity and strengthen the national cybersecurity posture.

Cyber threats evolving and looming above the maritime sector as the Maritime industry steps into the world of cyber risk. The cyber risk is vast and includes array of ransomware capable of shutting down port operations to GPS, halting steering vessels as hackers are get more creative.

Any cyberthreat on maritime sector also involves national security and is not isolated and target of cyber criminals. Maritime security involves trade, global logistics, oil and gas, defense which are major reasons to map maritime cyber threat to national security.

With an aim to deepen understanding of cyber threats in the maritime domain, the Indian Navy is organized the seminar.

The seminar, titled ‘Impact of Cyber Attacks on Maritime Sector and Its Effects on National Security and International Relations’, aims to foster collaboration among key stakeholders to enhance cybersecurity and strengthen the national cybersecurity posture.

Minister of State for IT Ministry, Jitin Prasada, deliver the keynote address during the inaugural session. The seminar will feature panel discussions each led by distinguished experts from the ministries and organizations.

The seminar aims to advance Hon’ble PM’s vision of MAHASAGAR (Mutual and Holistic Advancement for Security and Growth Across the Regions) by reinforcing a safe, secure cyberspace, and echoes the call for ‘Aatmanirbhar Bharat’ through indigenous, secure-by-design digital systems and robust public-private partnership.

Aligned with Maritime India Vision 2030 and the Amrit Kaal Vision 2047, the seminar positions cybersecurity as a core enabler of port-led growth, smart logistics, offshore energy security, and mission critical naval operations.

These include the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoPNG), the National Security Council Secretariat (NSCS), the Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL), the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (DGH), the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In), the National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre (NCIIPC), and the National Maritime Foundation (NMF) as well as leaders from private organisations.

The topics for panel discussions are ‘Global Cyber Threats to Maritime Infrastructure,’ ‘Civil and Military Partnership,’ and ‘Maritime Sector as Critical Information Infrastructure’.

Scroll to top