Supplychain attacks

Scattered Spider Group Target Aviation Sector; Third Party Providers to Vendors at Risk. Solutions to Improve Security Posture

Recently the Scattered Spider Hacker group or cybercriminals are targeting the airline industry at large and keen interest on aviation sector.

The Scattered Spider group relies mostly on social engineering techniques that can impersonate employees or contractors to deceive IT help desks into granting access” and frequently involves methods to bypass multifactor authentication (MFA), as per observation by FBI.

Earlier the group breached at least two major US airlines in June, bypassed security protocols by exploiting remote access tools and manipulating support staff as reported by CNN .

There is a growing cyber risk on aviation sector and how the air traffic control is managed during attack which makes subsequent aviation systems vulnerable to cyberattacks due to outdated technology in many cases.

And cyber criminals are resorting to advanced techniques by which they can halt operations via cyberattacks that have the ability to take over or invade technology systems which in turn disrupt information flow from the aircraft to pilots to the airlines’ operations center resulting in chaos and delay in flight operations.

Every operation and service delivered by airlines is supported by technology and once that is not responding ,subsequent operations are halted i.e. flight management software, air traffic control communications, baggage handling systems and in-flight entertainment platforms will fail inevitability.
Recently the Scattered Spider group was behind a big data breach potentially exposing Social Security numbers, insurance claims and health information of tens of millions of customers.

Repercussions of Data Breaches Impacting Third parties

Cybercriminals often take advantage of fragile cyber security posture linked to smaller third parties that provide services to larger, well-established enterprises or industry. In-fact many vendors dont have cybersecurity protection and proper cybersecurity awareness in place to mitigate against attacks.

Cyber attacks have evolved to become increasingly complex, making vendor risk management critical. With rise in digital transformation, cloud services and AI technology has given cyber criminals greater potential to penetrate unsecured networks and systems more then ever.

Address the Threat Landscape with Best Practices

Data breaches that originate from third-party vendors cause big fines and legal consequences are huge and affect primary organization. Along with these challenges, organizations often rely on third parties for critical services and cyber criminals take advantage of these vulnerability.

Organizations can still take steps to mitigate and defend against these attacks even as they onboard new vendors or service providers.

Let us see the emerging threats across third-party vendors:

  • Supply chain attacks by cybercriminals often target companies that supply services to many different companies (e.g. MSPs, IT) they cause great impact as IoT and other hardware devices manufactured by third parties can be infected malicious firmware .These malware can steal sensitive data. 
  • Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS)The dark web often sells kits (RaaS) and now it is combined with generative AI making attractive for cyber criminals to launch attacks. RaaS can disrupt critical services of organizations.
  • Threat from third parties Unintentional human error occur where providers misconfigure not so accurate data or data deletion happens or poor cybersecurity practices of easy passwords circulating among users. There could also be vendors with financial motives who don’t go through the same security process known as insider threat and don’t pass security test laid for regular employees.
  • Software supply chain attacks As we witnessed outsourcing third-party SaaS services and cloud technology makes it easy to target vulnerabilities in software code. This impacting hundreds of well-established organizations using the same software and same chain of malware flows.
  • Cloud vulnerabilities The provider or cloud service is responsible for securing the cloud infrastructure while the customer or vendor is responsible for securing their data and applications. A lack of proper security measures by the customer or third party can result in data breaches, data loss or supply chain attacks. Since cloud service or data center is all outsources so security lapse may happen
  • Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) is linked to State-sponsored attacks who generally target third parties to penetrate into systems over an extended period of time. For example, they might compromise a third-party network to gain lateral access to the main organization’s IT infrastructure, making it difficult to detect in time.   
  • Deepfake and social engineering attacks. Emerging AI-technology can manipulate employee or C-level executives to trick users into divulging information to execute identity fraud, phishing attacks, sign fraudulent contracts, or gain unauthorized access to restricted systems and networks. 
  • Zero-day exploits exploited by cyber criminals before they are identified by developers and third-party providers and patched. At times if patch is slow process attackers launch attacks during this delay.   

Solutions that will improve Security Posture with Intru360 from Intruceptlabs

The new business environment demands IT support for a wider range of monitoring, security and compliance requirements. This creates significant burdens on network performance and network security as more appliances need access to incoming data.

Intrucept platform (Intru360) cover overall risk, detection, prevention, correlation, investigation, and response across endpoints, users, networks, and SaaS applications, offering end-to-end visibility.

Intru360 gives security analysts and SOC managers a clear view across the organization, helping them fully understand the extent and context of an attack. It also simplifies workflows by automatically handling alerts, allowing for faster detection of both known and unknown threats.

Identify latest threats without having to purchase, implement, and oversee several solutions or find, hire, and manage a team security analyst.

Sources: https://www.darkreading.com/cyberattacks-data-breaches/scattered-spider-hacking-spree-airline-sector

Coinbase Identified as Primary Target in GitHub Action supply chain attack

Recently the attack on Coinbase by bad actors and targeting their agentkit project revealed that attackers are active in crypto community. The attackers gained right to access to the repository after obtaining a GitHub token with sufficient permissions.

As per researchers from at Palo Alto Networks’ Unit 42 and Wiz, attackers compromised continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines of thousands of repositories, putting them at risk.

The attack failed and highlighted the constant threats against crypto projects happening and in this case the aim was on the Coinbase project, get access to exchange ecosystem and steal crypto assets. On time Coinbase took handle of the incident that could have led attacker to change approach to a large-scale attack and compromise many projects.

As per Reuters, 2025 the crypto industry has suffered a series of thefts, prompting questions about the security of customer funds, with hacking amount more than $2 billion in 2024 – the fourth straight year where proceeds have topped more than $1 billion.

Details of the attack methodology

According to cybersecurity firm Wiz, its analysis of GitHub identities used in the attack shows that the attacker is active in the crypto community and likely operates from Europe or Africa.

The attack exploited vulnerabilities in popular GitHub Actions, leading to the potential exposure of sensitive CI/CD secrets across numerous projects.

The attack involved the compromise of the review dog/action-setup@v1 GitHub Action.

A total of 218 repositories were confirmed to have exposed secrets, despite over 23,000 using the affected action. The payload was focused on exploiting the public CI/CD flow of one of their open source projects – agentkit, probably with the purpose of leveraging it for further compromises. However, the attacker was not able to use Coinbase secrets or publish packages.

  • After this initial attack, threat actor believed to have moved to the larger attack scenario that has since gained widespread attention globally.
  • As per researchers the attacker began preparing several days before reports surfaced, eventually affecting specific versions of tj-actions/changed-files and putting a significant number of repositories at risk.
  • The incident reflects how attackers can abuse third-party actions or dependencies to compromise software supply chains, potentially resulting in unauthorized access, data breaches and code tampering.
  • Attackers actions confirmed what was initially highly focused on Coinbase and expanded to all projects utilizing tj-actions/changed-files once their initial attempt failed.

The exposed secrets included GitHub tokens and other sensitive information, with some being short-lived.

“The attacker took significant measures to conceal their tracks using various techniques, such as leveraging dangling commits, creating multiple temporary GitHub user accounts, and obfuscating their activities in workflow logs (especially in the initial Coinbase attack),” Gil, Senior Research Manager at Palo Alto Networks, told The Hacker News. “These findings indicate that the attacker is highly skilled and has a deep understanding of CI/CD security threats and attack tactics.”

Overview of attack:

The attack affected only 218 were confirmed to have leaked secrets. The majority of these secrets were short-lived tokens that expire after a single workflow run. However, some repositories also exposed more sensitive credentials, including those for DockerHub, npm, and AWS.

tj-actions and reviewdog

During March 10 and March 14, 2025, an attacker successfully pushed a malicious commit to the tj-actions/changed-files GitHub repository. This commit contained a Base64-encoded payload shown in Figure 1, which prints all of the credentials that were present in the CI runner’s memory to the workflow’s log.

(Image: unit42.paloaltonetworks)

Figure 1. The malicious snippet that was introduced to tj-actions/changed-files.

The company stated that their security measures prevented any successful exploitation of the exposed secrets.

While Coinbase managed to avert significant damage, the incident serves as a reminder for organizations to strengthen their security protocols and remain vigilant against potential threats in the software supply chain.

The attacker was able to add the malicious commit (0e58ed8) to the repository by using a GitHub token with write permissions that they obtained previously. The attacker disguised the commit to look as if it was created by renovate[bot] — a legitimate user.

The commit was then added to a legitimate pull request that was opened by the real renovate[bot] and automatically merged, as configured for this workflow.

These steps enabled the attacker to infect the repository, without the activity being detected. Once the commit was merged, the attacker pushed new git tags to the repository to override its existing tags, making them all point to the malicious commit in the repository.

Coinbase as a soft target for attackers

Cryptocurrency platforms are frequent targets for cybercriminals due to their high-value assets and financial data.

Coinbase’s agentkit repository is used for blockchain AI agents, meaning any compromise could potentially be used for manipulating transactions, altering AI behavior, or gaining unauthorized access to blockchain-related systems. Researchers have witnessed a systemic risks of software supply chains, particularly in open-source ecosystems.

When a single dependency is compromised, it can have far-reaching consequences across thousands of projects. The reliance on shared libraries and GitHub Actions makes modern development more efficient but also inherently vulnerable to such cascading attacks.

The GitHub Actions supply chain attack highlights the vulnerabilities inherent in widely used automation tools.


Sources:

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/coinbase-was-primary-target-of-recent-github-actions-breaches/

https://undercodenews.com

 


Click here

Scroll to top