Cyber risk

OpenCTI Web-Hook Flaw Enables Full System Compromise

Summary

OEMFiligran
SeverityCritical
CVSS Score9.1
CVEsCVE-2025-24977
Actively ExploitedNo
Exploited in WildNo
Advisory Version1.0

Overview

A critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-24977) in the OpenCTI Platform allows authenticated users with specific permissions to execute arbitrary commands on the host infrastructure, leading to potential full system compromise.

Vulnerability NameCVE IDProduct AffectedSeverityFixed Version
​ Webhook Remote Code Execution vulnerability  CVE-2025-24977OpenCTI  Critical  6.4.11

Technical Summary

The vulnerability resides in OpenCTI’s webhook templating system, which is built on JavaScript. Users with elevated privileges can inject malicious JavaScript into web-hook templates.

Although the platform implements a basic sandbox to prevent the use of external modules, this protection can be bypassed, allowing attackers to gain command execution within the host container.

Due to common deployment practices using Docker or Kubernetes, where environment variables are used to pass sensitive data (eg: credentials, tokens), exploitation of this flaw may expose critical secrets and permit root-level access, leading to full infrastructure takeover.

CVE IDSystem AffectedVulnerability DetailsImpact
    CVE-2025-24977  OpenCTI (≤ v6.4.10)The webhook feature allows JavaScript-based message customization. Users with manage customizations permission can craft malicious JavaScript in templates to bypass restrictions and execute OS-level commands. Since OpenCTI is often containerized, attackers can gain root access and extract sensitive environment variables passed to the container.  Root shell access in the container, exposure of sensitive secrets, full system compromise, lateral movement within infrastructure.

Remediation:

  • Upgrade: Immediately update to OpenCTI version 6.4.11 or later.
  • Restrict user permissions: Especially the manage customizations capability — limit access to trusted personnel only.
  • Review and audit: Existing webhook configurations for signs of misuse, unauthorized scripts, or suspicious behavior.
  • Implement container hardening practices: Reduce risk of secret exposure by:
    • Avoiding storage of secrets in environment variables when possible.
    • Using dedicated secret management tools.
    • Running containers with least privilege and limiting runtime capabilities.

The misuse can grant the attacker a root shell inside a container, exposing internal server-side secrets and potentially compromising the entire infrastructure.

Conclusion:
CVE-2025-24977 presents a highly exploitable attack vector within the OpenCTI platform and must be treated as an urgent priority for remediation.

The combination of remote code execution, privileged access and secret exposure in containerized environments makes it especially dangerous.

Organizations leveraging OpenCTI should upgrade to the latest version without delay, review their deployment security posture, and enforce strict access control around webhook customization capabilities.

References:

Deepfake’s pose a Challenge as Cyber-risk Increase

The Digital world is witnessing constant increase in threats from Deepfakes, a challenge for cyber leaders as cybersecurity related risk increase and digital trust.

Deepfakes being AI generated is much used by cybercriminals with intentions to bypass authenticated security protocols and appears realistic but fakes, often posing challenges to detect being generated via AI. We have three types of Deepfakes i.e. voice fakes or Audio, Deep Video maker fakes and shallow fakes or editing software like photoshop.

Growing Cyber Risk due to Deep Fakes

Due to these Deep fakes , which are quiet easier and more realistic to create, there has been deterioration of trust, propagation of misinformation that can be used widely and has potential to damage or conduct malicious exploitation across various domains across the industry verticals.

The cybersecurity industry has always came forward and explained what can be potential risk posed by Deep fakes and possible route to mitigate the risks posed by deepfakes, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaborations between industries. This will bring in proactive measures to ensure digital authenticity and trust in the face of evolving cyber frauds.

Failing to recognize a deep fake pose negative consequence both for individuals and organizational risk and this can be unable to recognize audio fakes or video fakes. The consequences can be from loss of trust to disinformation. From negative media coverage to falling prey to potential lawsuits and other legal ramifications and we cannot undermine cybersecurity related threats and phishing attacks.

There are case when Deep fakes have been ethically used but the numbers are less compare to malicious usage by cyber criminals. Synthetic media also termed as Deep fakes are created using deep learning algorithms, particularly generative adversarial networks (GANs).

These technologies can seamlessly swap faces in videos or alter audio, creating hyper-realistic but fabricated content. In creative industries, deepfakes offer capabilities such as virtual acting and voice synthesis.

 Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) consists of two neural networks: a generator and a discriminator.

  • Generator: In this case the network creates synthetic data, such as images or videos from any random sound alert and mimic real data.
  • Discriminator generally evaluates the generated content against real data. 

Deepfakes uses deep learning algorithms to analyze and synthesize visual and audio content which are painful task to determine the real ones, posing significant challenge to ethical security concerns.

While posing threats Deep fakes also provide another gateway for cyber attack specifically Phishing attacks. Tricking victims or impersonating an individual or an entity may open doors for revealing sensitive information and threat to data security.
The audios created via Deepfake could be used to bypass voice recognition systems giving attackers access to secure systems and invading personal privacy.

Uses cases in Deepfakes to understand the reach and impact:

Scammers and Fraudsters can benefit as Deepfakes can develop audio replication and use them for malicious intent like asking financial help from individuals they encounter or voice clone as some important person and demand or extort money.

Identity Theft is often overlooked and this impacts mostly financial institutions and scammers can easily bypass such authentication by cloning voices. Scammers also may easily develop convincing replicas of government ID proofs to gain access to business information or a misuse it as a customer. 

Fusing images of high profile public figures with offensive images by employing deepfake technology without their knowledge by criminals and hackers are growing each day . This kind of act can eventually lead to demanding money by cyber criminals or face consequences leading to defaming.

Conspiracy against governments or national leaders by faking their image or creating false hoax where the image or voice is used by cyber criminals often hired by opposing systems in place to disturb peace and harmony and also sound business operations.

Email are the key entry point for cyberattacks and presently we see deepfake technology being used by cyber criminals to create realistic phishing emails. These emails  bypass conventional security filters an area we cannot afford to neglect.

How will you detect Deep fakes?

Few technicalities are definitely there that may not be recognizable but there are few minute and hairsplitting details.

In Video fakes its often seen no movement in the eye or unnatural facial expression. The skin colour may be sightly different and in-consistent body positioning including the mismatch lip-syncing and body structure and face structure not similar as what we used to witness or accustomed viewing.

Being a grave concern from cyber security perspective its important to remain alert on new evolving technologies on Deep fakes and know their usage to defend on all frontiers both at individual and organizational level.

As Deep fakes are AI driven and rising phishing attacks that imbibe deep fakes pose a challenge where in mostly social media profile are used. The available AI-enabled computers allow cybercriminals to use chatbots no body can detect as fake.

Mitigating the Digital Threat

  • Organizations or individuals require robust security measures to implement AI-based security solutions and develop improved knowledge of phishing methods in order to tackle the digital threat.
  • Remaining proactive in all level of cyber security to navigate the complex challenge of Deep fakes is important, while Deep fakes defiantly poses strong technical challenge but proactive cybersecurity practices can stop cybercriminals from luring victims in their trap.
  • Government bodies and tech institutions or organizations that are tech savy to have more collaborative efforts to recognize deep fakes and effectively deal with challenges.
  • The various regulations and more recently the DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act ), will help navigate these challenges as more investments in open sources security will rise by countries and organizations.
  • Major investments in AI-driven detection tools are being soughed after at enterprise level, those having stronger authentication mechanisms and improved digital literacy are critical to mitigating these emerging threats.
  • Investing in Email security service that offers automated protection will assist in blocking major phishing attempts

    As per KPMG report, Deepfakes may be growing in sophistication and appear to be a daunting threat. However, by integrating deepfakes into the company’s cybersecurity and risk management, CISOs  in assosiations with CEO, and Chief Risk Officers (CRO) – can help their companies stay one step ahead of malicious actors.

    This calls for a broad understanding across the organization of the risks of deepfakes, and the need for an appropriate budget to combat this threat.

    If Deepfakes can be utilized to infiltrate an organization, the same technology can also protect it. Collaborating with deepfake cybersecurity specialists helps spread knowledge and continually test and improve controls and defenses, to avoid fraud, data loss and reputational damage.

    BISO Analytics:

    We at Intruceptlabs have a mission and that is to protect your organization from any cyber threat keeping confidentiality and integrity intact.

    We have BISO Analytics as a service to ensure business continues while you remain secured in the world of cybersecurity. BISO’s translates concepts and connects the dots between cybersecurity and business operations and functions are in synch with cyber teams.

    Sources: https://kpmg.com/xx/en/our-insights/risk-and-regulation/deepfake-threats.html

    AI-Driven Phishing And Deep Fakes: The Future Of Digital Fraud

Users of WhatsApp Exposed to Sophisticated Spyware Attack

The recent Spyware attack on WhatsApp users is linked to Israeli surveillance firm Paragon Solutions that targets journalists, activists, and civil society members using sophisticated “zero-click” hacking methods that require no user interaction.

Attack Confirmed By Meta

Meta, the parent company of WhatsApp, has officially acknowledged the attack, stating that the messaging platform was compromised by hackers deploying spyware. Following multiple reports of breaches, Meta informed Italy’s National Cybersecurity Agency, confirming that about 90 users across 24 countries were targeted.

The spyware attack came to light when Luca Casarini, a migrant rescue activist and co-founder of Mediterranea Saving Humans, and investigative journalist Francesco Cancellato, received an alert from WhatsApp, notifying their device had been infiltrated by spyware.

What is Spyware and what makes Spyware attack special?

Spyware is one of the most commonly used cyberattack methods used by hackers and makes it difficult to trace and identify by users and does some serious harm to networks. These data are used to track, steal, and sell user data, such as internet usage, credit card, and bank account details, or steal user credentials to spoof their identities.

As per Fortinet, Spyware is malicious software that enters a user’s computer, gathers data from the device and user, and sends it to third parties without their consent. A commonly accepted spyware definition is a strand of malware designed to access and damage a device without the user’s consent. 

How Zero-Click Hacking affect our Online Digital device

The Zero click hacking techniques was stunning for users which is not traceable

Unlike any other phishing attacks that require users to click on malicious links. In this method attackers infect a device without any action from the user. Such advanced tactics enable surveillance on a large scale, posing severe risks to privacy and security worldwide.

The revelation has reignited global concerns over digital espionage and unauthorized surveillance. Cybersecurity experts warn that the attack on WhatsApp underscores the vulnerabilities present in even the most widely used communication platforms. As investigations continue, users are urged to update their software regularly and remain vigilant against potential cyber threats.

Mobile spyware typically attacks mobile devices through three methods:

  • Flaws in operating systems: Attackers can exploit flaws in mobile operating systems that are typically opened up by holes in updates. 
  • Malicious applications: These typically lurk within legitimate applications that users download from websites rather than app stores.
  • Unsecured free Wi-Fi networks: Wi-Fi networks in public places like airports and cafes are often free and simple to sign in to, which makes them a serious security risk. Attackers can use these networks to spy on what connected users are doing.

Significant Cyber threat of Spyware

The Spyware attack left users fall prey to online digital attack and question on govt. surveillance which was taken seriously by Italy.Over the years Spyware  infected millions of devices, stealing sensitive information.

Some of the most devastating spyware cases helps us understand how serious this threat can be.

  • Pegasus — Spyware Behind Global Surveillance Scandals

Pegasus — developed by Israeli tech firm NSO Group — is the most high-profile spyware ever created. While it was originally marketed as a tool for governments to combat terrorism and criminal activities, it has become infamous for its misuse.

Reports have revealed that Pegasus has been used to monitor journalists, activists, and political figures, raising serious concerns about privacy and human rights violations. Its ability to infect devices without any user interaction makes it especially dangerous and difficult to detect.

  • FinSpy (FinFisher) — Government Tool for Full Device Control

FinSpy, also known as FinFisher, is a spyware tool developed by Gamma Group, a company based in Germany. Initially marketed to governments and law enforcement agencies as a way to combat crime and terrorism, FinSpy has been linked to unauthorized surveillance and there is concern about its use by oppressive regimes. The spyware is capable of targeting multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile and difficult to escape.

  • GravityRAT — Cross-Border Espionage Targeting India

GravityRAT spyware was initially designed to target individuals in India. It’s believed to be linked to cyber espionage efforts originating from Pakistan. Its primary goal is to steal sensitive information, including files, contact lists, and user data.

GravityRAT typically spreads through phishing emails that trick users into downloading malicious attachments. Once the victim opens the file, the spyware silently installs itself, granting attackers control over the infected device.

  • DarkHotel — Targeting Business Travelers Through Hotel Wi-Fi

DarkHotel is a sophisticated spyware campaign that’s been active for over a decade, primarily targeting business travelers staying in luxury hotels. Discovered in 2007, this Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) has affected high-profile executives, government officials, and corporate leaders. The attackers aim to steal sensitive business information, like trade secrets and confidential documents, while victims are connected to hotel Wi-Fi networks.

  • Agent Tesla — Password and Keystroke Thief for Hire

Agent Tesla is technically classified as a Remote Access Trojan (RAT) and keylogger, though it has spyware-like functionalities. First discovered in 2014, Agent Tesla has gained notoriety for its ability to steal sensitive information, such as login credentials, keystrokes, and clipboard data. It can also take screenshots and extract information from email clients, web browsers, and other applications, making it a powerful tool for cybercriminals.

Critical Flaw in WordPress Hunk Companion Plugin Enables Unauthorized Plugin Installation

Summary

OEM

WordPress

Severity

Critical

Date of Announcement

2024-12-13

CVSS score

9.8

CVE

CVE-2024-11972

Exploited in Wild

Yes

Patch/Remediation Available

Yes 

Advisory Version

1.0

Overview

A Critical flaw in the WordPress Hunk Companion plugin has been actively exploited to enable unauthorized installation and activation of plugins. This vulnerability stems from insufficient authorization checks on a REST API endpoint. Exploited sites may see attackers silently install malicious or outdated plugins, leading to severe security risks, including remote code execution (RCE), unauthorized access, and website compromise.

Vulnerability Name

CVE ID

Product Affected

Severity

CVSS Score

Hunk Companion Plugin Vulnerability

CVE-2024-11972

Hunk Companion Plugin for WordPress

Critical

9.8

Technical Summary

CVE ID

System Affected

Vulnerability Details

Impact

CVE-2024-11972

Hunk Companion plugin versions  prior to 1.8.4

This vulnerability is caused by improper validation mechanisms in the file hunk-companion/import/app/app.php, a script responsible for handling plugin import and installation processes. At its core, the bug permits unauthenticated requests to bypass critical permission checks intended to ensure that only authorized users can install plugins.

This vulnerability potentially leads to remote code execution, unauthorized access, and full website compromise.

Remediations

  • “Hunk Companion” WordPress plugin, should update to version 9.0 or later.

General Recommendations

  • Regularly inspect your WordPress site for unknown plugins or modifications.
  • Reducing the risk of delayed patching can be achieved by enabling automatic updates for all plugins
  • Review server and WordPress logs for unauthorized login attempts to detect possible compromise.
  • Keep all plugins, themes, and WordPress core updated. Use strong, unique passwords and enable two-factor authentication for admin accounts.

Zero-Day Vulnerability in Windows Exposes NTLM Credentials

Summary

OEM

Microsoft

Severity

Critical

Date of Announcement

2024-12-12

CVE

Not yet assigned

Exploited in Wild

No

Patch/Remediation Available

Yes (No official patch)

Advisory Version

1.0

Vulnerability Name

NTLM Zero-Day

Overview

A recently discovered zero-day vulnerability in Windows, enables attackers to steal user credentials through a malicious file viewed in File Explorer. This “clickless” exploit bypasses the need for user interaction, creating significant security risks. While Microsoft investigates, 0patch has released an unofficial micropatch to mitigate the threat. Users are advised to apply the patch or implement mitigations to reduce exposure.

Vulnerability Name

CVE ID

Product Affected

Severity

NTLM zero-day

Not Yet Assigned

Microsoft Windows

Critical

Technical Summary

CVE ID

System Affected

Vulnerability Details

Impact

Not Yet Assigned

Windows 7 to 11 (24H2), Server 2008 R2 to 2022

A zero-day vulnerability that allows NTLM credential theft by viewing a malicious file in File Explorer. The flaw forces an outbound NTLM connection, leaking NTLM hashes. Exploitation requires no user interaction beyond viewing a malicious file, which can be delivered through shared folders, USB drives, or malicious downloads in the browser's default folder.

Enables attackers to steal NTLM credentials and  gain unauthorized access of the affected systems.

Remediations

  • Apply the 0patch Micropatch:
    • Register for a free account at 0patch Central.
    • Install the 0patch agent to automatically receive the micropatch.
  • Disable NTLM Authentication:
    • Navigate to Security Settings > Local Policies > Security Options in Group Policy.
    • Configure “Network security: Restrict NTLM” policies to limit NTLM usage. 

General Recommendations

  • Only enable patches or configurations after testing them on non-critical devices to ensure minimal impact.
  • Stay updated on Microsoft’s response and the availability of an official patch through trusted news sources or Microsoft’s advisories.
  • Inform users about the risks of handling unfamiliar files and downloading content from untrusted sources.
  • Monitor systems for suspicious NTLM-related activity.

Blue Yonder SaaS giant breached by Termite Ransomware Gang

The company acknowledged it is investigating claims by a public threat group linked to the November ransomware attack. 

Continue Reading
Scroll to top